Sharmini Peries talks to Jorgo Riss of Greenpeace who says leaked TTIP documents shows a huge transfer of power from people to big business and negotiator’s consulting with the corporate sector. (The Real News)
- TTIP under threat after Germany claims US not making ‘any serious concessions’
- Malmström concerned about public perception of TTIP
- Protest never changes anything? Look at how TTIP has been derailed
- TTIP has been kicked into the long grass … for a very long time
- Leaked TTIP Documents Cast Doubt on EU-US Trade Deal
- TTIP explained: The secretive US-EU treaty that undermines democracy
“Sometimes people don’t want to hear the truth because they don’t want their illusions destroyed.”~ Friedrich Nietzsche
The world woke up to righteous condemnation over the latest Charle Hebdo cartoons. The French satirical magazine has been called everything from callous to disgusting to racist and insensitive.
And to be clear, they may very well be all of that, and more.
In the first drawing: “Si près du but…” or “So close to his goal.” The cartoon shows Aylan Kurdi’s body washed ashore in front of McDonalds ad, saying “Two children combos for the price of one.”
In what seems to be a rather distasteful depiction of the boy’s plight and the ongoing refugee disaster, perhaps the artists are saying something else.
Imagine what lengths the Kurdi family have gone through – the war, the hiding, the human traffickers, the trauma, and all so that they might reach a better place: a land of hamburgers and scavenger capitalism. Europe is sure as hell not all it’s made out to be.
Lee Camp talks to Ted Rall, an award-winning nationally-syndicated political cartoonist who was recently fired by the Los Angeles Times after criticising Los Angeles Police Department. Rall is the author of a number books including Snowden and Billionaires & Ballot Bandits with Greg Palast. (Redacted Tonight)
‘Iran has launched an anti-Isis cartoon competition, inviting submissions from around the world which mock the militant group and the atrocities it has committed.
Organisers said selected works would be displayed at four cultural centres across Tehran, and that a winner would be announced on 31 May.
According to the state-run IRNA news agency, artists were briefed by Iran’s House of Cartoon to focus on “the crimes committed by the Islamic State (Isis)”.
Mohammad Habibi, the executive secretary of the contest, said 280 works had been selected from 800 submissions, including entries from over 40 countries such as Brazil, Australia and Indonesia.’
‘The co-founder of the group behind the contest to award $10,000 for the best cartoon depiction of Muhammad is a New Yorker who runs a blog that campaigns to stop the “Islamification” of America.
Pamela Geller used her blog Atlas Shrugs to declare “this is war” in the hours after the shooting of two gunmen at the contest. The event had been organised by the American Freedom Defense Initiative, a group she set up with Robert Spencer in 2010.
Geller, the winner of numerous awards from far-right organisations such as the David Horowitz Freedom Center, is credited with coining the term “ground zero mega mosque” as part of highly publicised campaign against the development of a community centre, which included a mosque, a few blocks from where the twin towers once stood in New York.
She became politically active after 11 September and has told various newspapers she had never heard of Osama Bin Laden until the day of the attacks but started educating herself as a housewife living in Long Island raising four children. She eventually started a blog, Atlas Shrugs.’
- Police kill 2 men who opened fire outside Muhammad art show in Garland
- Gunmen killed outside US exhibition on Islam’s prophet
- Muslims Defend Pam Geller’s Right to Hate
- The woman behind anti-Islamic Muhammad cartoon contest and her long history of hatred
- Extreme ‘free speech’ group refused to cancel provocative ‘Muhammad Art Exhibit’ despite protests
- ISIs Claims Responsibility for Texas Shooting – Reports
- Pamela Geller – Profile
- Geert Wilders – Profile
‘More than two dozen writers including Junot Díaz, Joyce Carol Oates and Lorrie Moore have joined a protest against a freedom of expression award for Charlie Hebdo, signing a letter taking issue with what they see as a “reward” for the magazine’s controversial cartoons.
In their letter the writers protest against the award from PEN America, the prominent literary organization of which most of the signatories are members, accusing the French satirical magazine of mocking a “section of the French population that is already marginalized, embattled, and victimized”.
Twenty-six writers, including Pulitzer and National Book Award winners, joined six others – Peter Carey, Michael Ondaatje, Francine Prose, Teju Cole, Rachel Kushner and Taiye Selasi – who had previously withdrawn from the PEN gala celebrating the award. The letter condemns the murder of 12 Hebdo staffers by Chérif and Saïd Kouachi, two extremists enraged by the magazine’s cartoons of the prophet Muhammad.
But the writers also criticize the decision to give an award to Charlie Hebdo.’
- Charlie Hebdo cartoonist: ‘I will no longer draw Mohammed’
- Belfast ‘shamed’ after university cancels Charlie Hebdo conference
- No One Compared Charlie Hebdo to the Nazis, and It’s a Logical Sin To Say So
- It’s not about Islam, it’s about courage: Authors protesting Charlie Hebdo’s PEN award are missing the point
- Salman Rushdie Rails at Critics of Pen’s Pro-Charlie Hebdo Tribute
- Writers Withdraw From PEN Gala to Protest Award to Charlie Hebdo
- Read the Letters and Comments of PEN Writers Protesting the Charlie Hebdo Award
- Free-Speech Wannabees Pull out of Free-Speech Gala Honoring Cartoonists Who Died for Free Speech
- I admire Charlie Hebdo’s courage. But it does not deserve a PEN award
- Joe Sacco: On Satire – a response to the Charlie Hebdo attacks
- Danish PM: ‘We don’t know the motive for the attacks’
- Suspect In Copenhagen Attacks Killed, Police Say
- ‘Copenhagen Gunman’ Shot Dead After Two Attacks In The City
- Early Report of Second Shooting In Center Of Copenhagen
- Bullets Fly At Freedom Of Expression Debate In Copenhagen
- Barely a Month After Charlie Hebdo, Twin Terror Attacks Hit Denmark
- Copenhagen Shooting Described As Terror Attack
‘I’ve known Adam Curtis for nearly 20 years. We’re friends. We see movies together, and once even went to Romania on a mini-break to attend an auction of Nicolae Ceausescu’s belongings. But it would be wrong to characterise our friendship as frivolous. Most of the time when we’re together I’m just intensely cross-questioning him about some new book idea I have.
Sometimes Adam will say something that seems baffling and wrong at the time, but makes perfect sense a few years later. I could give you lots of examples, but here’s one: I’m about to publish a book – So You’ve Been Publicly Shamed – about how social media is evolving into a cold and conservative place, a giant echo chamber where what we believe is constantly reinforced by people who believe the same thing, and when people step out of line in the smallest ways we destroy them. Adam was warning me about Twitter’s propensity to turn this way six years ago, when it was still a Garden of Eden. Sometimes talking to Adam feels like finding the results of some horse race of the future, where the long-shot horse wins.
I suppose it’s no surprise that Adam would notice this stuff about social media so early on. It’s what his films are almost always about – power and social control. However, people don’t only enjoy them for the subject matter, but for how they look, too – his wonderful, strange use of archive.’
- Trailer for Adam Curtis’ new film Bitter Lake
- Adam Curtis: cult film-maker with an eye for the unsettling
- Adam Curtis in the emperor’s new clothes
- Adam Curtis: “We don’t read newspapers because the journalism is so boring”
- In Conversation with Adam Curtis (2012 Two-Part Interview)
- Looking Beneath the Waves (2012 VICE Interview)
- An Interview With Adam Curtis (2011, The Wire)
- Adam Curtis: Have computers taken away our power?
- Adam Curtis – Wikipedia
Moroccan-born mayor of Rotterdam tells Islamic hardliners to “fuck off” if they don’t like Western ideals
‘After the terror attacks last week in Paris, the Muslim mayor of Rotterdam took a harsh tone with Islamic hardliners in the Netherlands, essentially saying that people who take issue with certain Western ideals and satirical newspapers can “fuck off.”
Mayor Ahmed Aboutaleb, who was born in Morocco and immigrated to the Netherlands when he was 15, made the remark during an appearance on Nieuwsuur, a national television program. Specifically, he said Muslim immigrants who are unable to accept “humorists” creating content for a newspaper could “fuck off” — or “rot toch op”in Dutch. He also relayed the message that if any Dutch Muslims are against freedom, then “for heaven’s sake pack your bags and leave.”‘
- Rotterdam’s mayor tells Muslims to pack their bags and go if they don’t like freedom
- Mayor of London: The Islamists want war, but it would be fatal if we fell for it
- Holland’s first immigrant mayor is hailed as ‘Obama on the Maas’
- Morrocan-Dutch Politician to Lead Dutch City: Muslim Tapped as Rotterdam Mayor
- France Arrests 54, Announces ‘Hate Speech’ Crackdown
- France Arrests a Comedian For His Facebook Comments, Showing the Sham of the West’s “Free Speech” Celebration
- France Arrests 54 For Defending Terrorism, Announces Crack Down
- France arrests dozens of people for hate speech
- French comedian to be tried after Charlie Hebdo gag
- Dieudonne held as France tackles hate speech
- Charlie Hebdo to produce 3m copies of latest edition in many languages
- “We vomit on all these people who suddenly say they are our friends,” says Charlie Hebdo cartoonist
- “Charlie Hebdo”, not racist? If you say so…
- If je ne suis pas Charlie, am I a bad person? Nuance gets lost in groupthink
- ‘I am not Charlie:” cracks in the unity after Paris attacks
- On Charlie Hebdo: A letter to my British friends
- German newspaper that reprinted Muhammad cartoons firebombed
- Belgian paper that ran Charlie cartoons evacuated after threat
- Why I Am Not Charlie
- Unmournable Bodies
- Trolls and Martyrdom: Je Ne Suis Pas Charlie
- Charlie Hebdo’s Most Controversial Religious Covers, Explained
- No, we are NOT all Charlie (and that’s a problem)
‘Below are cartoons drawn over the past several decades by Cabu, one of the most emblematic cartoonists at Charlie Hebdo (if not the most). Cabu was murdered along with his colleagues this past week. He was 75 years old.
Although no media outlet in the US will show you these images, they can all be found online with a simple Google search.
This cartoon by Cabu criticizes racial profiling, specifically discrimination by the French police against immigrants from North Africa and people of African descent. The caption reads: “No to racist controls [identity checks].”‘
- New Charlie Hebdo To Show Mohammed Cartoons
- The Charlie Hebdo I Know
- Charlie Hebdo Point-Missers Miss Point
- On not understanding “Charlie:” Why many smart people are getting it wrong
- Charlie Hebdo and its biting satire, explained in 9 of its most iconic covers
- Art Spiegelman Responds to Charlie Hebdo Attack, Power of Cartoons
- Charlie Hebdo: its history, humor, and controversies, explained
- Charlie Hebdo has had more legal run-ins with Christians than with Muslims
- We Must Grieve the Dead Without Misconstruing Racism as Democratic Ideal
- Soumission by Michel Houellebecq review – much more than a satire on Islamism
- Charlie Hebdo Is Heroic and Racist
- Charb: No, Charlie Hebdo isn’t racist
‘Le Monde reported on the Charlie Hebdo team at the Paris rally on Sunday, the largest demonstrations in France since the end of World War II. They were emotionally exhausted, having lived through a nightmarish week that saw 10 of their colleagues murdered in cold blood. (One of the staffers killed was a Muslim copy-editor known at the offices for the breadth of his learning).
And, fatigued as they are, they had soon to get back to work on the special edition of their weekly, which will be printed in a million copies rather than the 60,000 usual run.
They said their biggest regret was that they couldn’t have paraded caricatures from the past pages of Charlie Hebdo of the various heads of state who joined the rally– Benyamin Netanyahu, King Abdallah II of Jordan, of former French president Nicolas Sarkozy, of Russian Foreign Minister Sergueï Lavrov, of Turkish prime minister Ahmet Davutoglu, and of all the authoritarian heads of state they had lampooned over the years. (Many of the world leaders in the rally would have at the least jailed the Chralie Hebdo if they had been operating in those countries).’
‘A prominent Dutch cartoonist at Charlie Hebdo heaped scorn on the French satirical weekly’s “new friends” since the massacre at its Paris offices on Wednesday.
“We have a lot of new friends, like the pope, Queen Elizabeth and (Russian President Vladimir) Putin. It really makes me laugh,” Bernard Holtrop, whose pen name is Willem, told the Dutch centre-left daily Volkskrant in an interview published Saturday.
France’s far-right National Front leader “Marine Le Pen is delighted when the Islamists start shooting all over the place,” said Willem, 73, a longtime Paris resident who also draws for the French leftist daily Liberation.
He added: “We vomit on all these people who suddenly say they are our friends.”‘
‘Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten, which angered Muslims by publishing cartoons of the Prophet Mohammad 10 years ago, will not republish Charlie Hebdo’s cartoons due to security concerns, the only major Danish newspaper not to do so.
“It shows that violence works,” the newspaper stated in its editorial on Friday.
Denmark’s other major newspapers have all republished cartoons from the French satirical weekly as part of the coverage of the attack which killed 12 people in Paris on Wednesday.
Many other European newspapers also republished Charlie Hebdo cartoons to protest against the killings.’
‘In the face of Pakistan’s prolific use of blasphemy laws and a culture of political violence, cartoonists must tread a thin line. But they do find ways to poke fun at the powerful — including religious extremists.
The conservative nation of 200 million people is consistently ranked one the world’s most dangerous countries for journalists, with reporters often caught between powerful spy agencies and Islamist militants.
Without subscribing to all the ideas of Charlie Hebdo’s satirists killed this week for their depictions of Prophet Mohammed, the country’s caricaturists have sustained a proud, decades long tradition of pushing the envelope of free speech.’
- Blowback: Paris Terror Suspect Radicalized by Outrage Over American Torture and Invasion of Iraq
- Blowback: Paris Terror Suspects Recently Returned from Syria and Demonstrated Military Training
- Suspects in Paris attack were on police radar for years
- Paris Attack Suspects Had Recently Returned From Syria
- Attackers at French newspaper seen as trained Islamist fighters
- Islamic State fighter praises attack on Paris satirical magazine
- Day-Long Manhunt After Paris Magazine Terror Attack Kills 12
- Where did the Paris shooters get their weapons?
- Young mother let terrorists into Charlie Hebdo building after threat against daughter
- Charlie Hebdo Conspiracy Theories Go Viral Online
‘[…] In the wake of the tragedy, many publications across the West have rushed to print reproductions of Charlie Hebdo covers as proof that terrorist violence cannot dampen free expression. Such homage to the magazine in its agony is in one sense fitting and proper, but in another sense it is the precise opposite of what the living Charlie was about.
Reproducing the imagery created by the murdered artists tends to sacralize them as embodiments of some abstract ideal of free speech. But many of the publications that today honor the dead as martyrs would yesterday have rejected their work as tasteless and obscene, as indeed it often was. The whole point of Charlie’s satire was to be tasteless and obscene, to respect no proprieties, to make its point by being untameable and incorrigible and therefore unpublishable anywhere else. The speech it exemplified was not free to express itself anywhere but in its pages. Its spirit was insurrectionist and anti-idealist, and its creators would be dumbfounded to find themselves memorialized as exemplars of a freedom that they always insisted was perpetually in danger and in need of a defense that only offensiveness could provide. To transform the shock of Charlie’s obscenities into veneration of its martyrdom is to turn the magazine into the kind of icon against which its irrepressible iconoclasm was directed. But as the poet Stéphane Mallarmé wrote of Edgar Allan Poe, death has a way of revealing the essence of things — and the essence of Charlie Hebdo was to express the inexpressible in images with the power to shock and offend.’
- Charlie Hebdo staff vow to print 1m copies as French media support grows
- Terrorism and Nuance
- Charlie Hebdo’s history of challenging and angering fundamentalists
- The Attack on Charlie Hebdo and the Tradition of Parisian Wit
- Charlie Hebdo: ‘An attack on the freedom of expression’
- Charlie Hebdo: its history, humor, and controversies
- Understanding what Charlie Hebdo really stood for
- French Weekly ‘Le Canard Enchaîné’ Ruffles Feathers in Paris
- Hitler’s Cartoon Problem and the Art of Controversy
‘There’s been a predictable split in the reactions to Wednesday’s slaughter of the staff of French satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo, along with others including police who were trying to protect them. On the one hand, hundreds of thousands of people have rallied in France and across Europe in defiance against those behind this attack on free speech…
… while others have taken a decidedly different tack, using the outrage as a justification for the rolling-back of online civil liberties. This approach was taken by Dan Hodges in the Telegraph, and by the Sun in an editorial arguing that “intelligence is our best defense… yet liberals still fret over the perceived assault on civil liberties of spooks analyzing emails.”’
- With Power of Social Media Growing, Police Now Monitoring and Criminalizing Online Speech
- French Government Quietly Enacts Controversial Surveillance Law On Christmas Eve
- France in the NSA’s crosshair : phone networks under surveillance
- The UK’s “emergency” DRIP surveillance law is now a done deal
- UK to stop its citizens seeing extremist material online
- UK moves towards longer jail terms for trolls
- “Plebgate” report shows why the UK’s data retention laws are such a terrible idea
- Sun makes official complaint over police use of Ripa against journalists
- Footage released of Guardian editors destroying Snowden hard drives
- Online mass-surveillance: “Protect right to privacy even when countering terrorism,” says UN expert
- International Convention on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)
- Pro-Surveillance article in the Telegraph
- The Sun editorial on the Charlie Hebdo shootings
- Blair laid bare: the article that may get you arrested
‘The deadly attack at a French satirical magazine today coincided with the release of a controversial book depicting a France led by an Islamic party and a Muslim president who bans women from the workplace.
The sixth novel by award-winning French author Michel Houellebecq, called “Submission,” plays on fears that western societies are being inundated by the influence of Islam. While French authorities haven’t linked the murders at Charlie Hebdo to Islamists, witnesses cited by Europe 1 radio and Agence France-Presse as saying that two hooded people entered the offices of the magazine, shooting at random and shouting “Allahu akbar,” or “God is great” in Arabic.
In the book, Houellebecq has the imaginary “Muslim Fraternity” party winning a presidential election in France against the nationalist, anti-immigration National Front. The cover of Charlie Hebdo’s latest edition features a cartoon of the author dressed as a sorcerer under the headline “The Predictions of the Wise Man Houellebecq.”’
‘In an eerie coincidence, the French cartoonist known as Charb – real name, Stephane Charbonnier – seemed to predict the attack in which he was murdered.
His last cartoon depicted a figure representing a jihadist in which the headline says: “Still no attack in France” – with the jihadist figure saying “Wait! We still have until the end of January to send our New Year wishes.” This was Charb’s last cartoon: it was published a few days before the attack that took his life and 11 others in an attack on the offices of Charlie Hebdo, a French magazine where Charb served as editor.
Charlie Hebdo has a long history of attacking Muslims, as well as other religions. The magazine’s offices were firebombed in 2011. It had just moved to new offices when the attack took place.’
- Charlie Hebdo’s mysterious last tweet before attack
- Is Attack Linked to Novel About France Under Islamist President?
- ‘Islamophobic’ Michel Houellebecq book featured by Charlie Hebdo published today
- Furore over novel depicting Muslim-run France
- Gunmen Attack French Magazine, Killing 12
- How Charlie Hebdo Became A Top Terrorist Target
- Videos show Paris gunmen were calm as they executed police officer, fled scene
- Satirical Newspaper Charlie Hebdo Braved Earlier Attack And Threats Before Deadly Shooting
- After Charlie Hebdo Attack, Being Muslim In France May Have Become Much Harder
- Charlie Hebdo has history of angering Muslims with cartoons
- Charlie Hebdo: A profile of the French satirical magazine
- Charlie Hebdo’s history of challenging and angering fundamentalists
- Cartoonists Pay Tribute to Charlie Hebdo Victims
- Cartoonist Ted Rall remembers Charlie Hebdo’s martyrs for free speech
- MSNBC interview with Courtney Radsch of the Committee to Protect Journalists
- The Bold Charlie Hebdo Covers the Satirical Magazine Was Not Afraid to Run
- Financial Times Europe Editor Tony Barber Accuses Charlie Hebdo Of ‘Muslim Baiting’
- Britain First Piggyback On Paris Shooting Massacre In Attempt To Sell Hoodies
On ‘the menace of Memes’ Spectator piece: Why you should use your critical thinking skills, whatever the information source
‘I’ll begin this article with an admission that I made a mistake. I always try to be careful that the infographics I create for social media are completely accurate (or clearly marked as satire when they’re jokes), however on Sunday 30th of November 2014 I shared an infographic made by someone else without properly fact checking it (the one in the article header).
It turns out that the image I shared was slightly misleading. The nine images of incredibly sparsely attended debates in parliament were perfectly accurate, but the two below claiming to be debates about MPs pay and expenses were just stock images of the House of Commons. The infographic in question was then cited in a Spectator article by Isabel Hartman entitled “The menace of Memes: How pictures can paint a thousand lies”.
I apologised as soon as I realised that I’d made a mistake in sharing a partially inaccurate image, but also took note of the fact that Isabel Hartman’s article was also misleading for the fact that that it implied that the image was deliberately inaccurate (made in bad faith), rather than the result of a quite obvious mistake (made in good faith), and also because it made the ludicrous argument that so few MPs bother to turn up to some debates because “it is more constructive to be outside the Chamber during those sessions”. The author casually dismissed all of the perfectly accurate pictures of incredibly sparsely attended parliamentary sessions (on the war in Afghanistan, child sex abuse, preventing knife crime, drugs laws, the effects of Iain Duncan Smith’s brutal welfare “reforms” on disabled people, the living wage, recognition of Palestine, tenancy reform, and Syrian refugees) as if they were probably just unconstructive waste-of-time type debates that might have been better had nobody bothered to attend them at all!
Had Isabel Hartman done the vaguest research on how someone might have mistakenly concluded that the two stock images were what they were claimed to be, she would have easily found this article on the BBC News website, and this article on the Daily Telegraph website which both lazily used old stock images to illustrate their articles about parliamentary debates on MPs pay and MPs expenses.’