More than 5,000 individuals have responded to the Government consultation calling for it enact Section 40 in full thus forcing UK publishers into a state-backed system of press regulation.
This is the number who have responded through the form on the website of campaign group Hacked Off.
Set against this there has been a mountain of opposition against enacting Section 40 of the Crime and Courts Act voiced by UK news publishers.
Section 40 states that news publishers who are not signed up to a press regulator which complies with Parliament’s Royal Charter on press regulation must pay both sides’ costs in libel and privacy actions that they win.
The law has been kept on ice by the Government since it was passed by Parliament in 2013. A Government consultation which asks whether it should finally enact Section 40, reform it or scrap it closes on Tuesday 10 January.
- Phone hacking is yesterday’s news, we should focus on far greater threats
- Section 40 Proposals Will Result In Surge Of ‘Ambulance-Chasing Lawyers’, Damian Collins Warns
- What Is Section 40 Of The Crime And Courts Act 2013, And How Might It Affect The Free Press?
- The stories that could not have been told under a controversial new press law
- Section 40: The only law in British history to punish people for telling the truth
- Metro uses ‘first ever’ leader column to oppose Section 40 law, calling it ‘clearly nuts’
- If another country had a press law like Section 40, Britain would condemn it for persecuting journalists