Once again, Barack Obama, the world’s most powerful military leader, has propagated an erroneous claim about the origins of war.
Speaking in Hiroshima on May 27, the President says: “Artifacts tell us that violent conflict appeared with the very first man.” World War II, he adds, “grew out of the same base instinct for domination or conquest that had caused conflicts among the simplest tribes.” [Italics added.] When accepting the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009, the President made similar claims. “War,” he said, “in one form or another, appeared with the first man.”
Obama has embraced the popular idea that war—not just aggression, or interpersonal violence, but lethal group conflict–is deeply rooted in our evolution and nature. This thesis has been propagated by such prominent scientists as Jared Diamond, Richard Wrangham, Edward Wilson and, most notably, psychologist Steven Pinker.
[…] The preponderance of evidence shows that war, far from being an ancient, innate behavior, was a cultural innovation—an “invention,” as anthropologist Margaret Mead put it–that emerged relatively recently in our prehistory, toward the end of the Paleolithic era.
- John Horgan Posts on War and Peace
- War Is Our Most Urgent Problem–Let’s Solve It
- Dear “Skeptics,” Bash Homeopathy and Bigfoot Less, Mammograms and War More
- Japanese Study Deals Another Blow to Deep-Roots Theory of War
- RIP Military Historian John Keegan, Who Saw War as Product of Culture Rather Than Biology
- John Bayley reviews ‘A History of Warfare’ by John Keegan and more
- Chimp Violence Fails to Support Deep-Roots Theory of War
- New Study of Prehistoric Skeletons Undermines Claim that War Has Deep Evolutionary Roots
- Survey of Earliest Human Settlements Undermines Claim that War Has Deep Evolutionary Roots
- The Prehistory of War and Peace in Europe and the Near East
- Margaret Mead’s war theory kicks butt of neo-Darwinian and Malthusian models
- New Baboon: Interview with John Horgan