‘Zacarias Moussaoui, a former al-Qaida operative sometimes referred to as the “20th hijacker” involved in the 9/11 attacks, claims that members of the Saudi royal family supported the terrorist organization.
In sworn testimony given last October from a Colorado federal prison where he is serving a life sentence, Moussaoui alleged that in the late 1990s he was directed by Osama bin Laden to create a digital database of al-Qaida’s donors.
“Sheikh Osama wanted to keep a record who give money … who is to be listened to or who contributed to the jihad,” Moussaoui said, according to a transcript of the deposition filed in federal court in New York on Monday and published Wednesday by the New York Times.
Among them: Prince Turki Al-Faisal, then the Saudi intelligence chief; Prince Bandar bin Sultan, the longtime Saudi ambassador to the United States; and Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, a prominent billionaire investor.’
- Moussaoui Calls Saudi Princes Patrons of Al Qaeda
- The Missing Pages of the 9/11 Report
- 9/11 Families Continue Search For Truth Despite Silence From White House
- 9/11: 100s of Warnings Ignored, US Ally Funding, Bush Admin Lies & Redacted Truths
- 9/11: Press for Truth (2006 Documentary)
- Zacarias Moussaoui – Wikipedia
- Complete 911 Timeline – History Commons
‘In a speech at Washington and Lee University, Michael Hayden, a former head of both the CIA and NSA, opined on signals intelligence under the Constitution, arguing that what the 4th Amendment forbids changed after September 11, 2001. He noted that “unreasonable search and seizure,” is prohibited under the Constitution, but cast it as a living document, with “reasonableness” determined by “the totality of circumstances in which we find ourselves in history.”
He explained that as the NSA’s leader, tactics he found unreasonable on September 10, 2001 struck him as reasonable the next day, after roughly 3,000 were killed. “I actually started to do different things,” he said. “And I didn’t need to ask ‘mother, may I’ from the Congress or the president or anyone else. It was within my charter, but in terms of the mature judgment about what’s reasonable and what’s not reasonable, the death of 3,000 countrymen kind of took me in a direction over here, perfectly within my authority, but a different place than the one in which I was located before the attacks took place. So if we’re going to draw this line I think we have to understand that it’s kind of a movable feast here.”‘
‘[…] Sen. Bob Graham said the redacted pages characterize the support network that allowed the 9/11 attacks to occur, and if that network goes unchallenged, it will only flourish. He said that keeping the pages classified is part of “a general pattern of coverup” that for 12 years has kept the American people in the dark. It is “highly improbable” the 19 hijackers acted alone, he said, yet the U.S. government’s position is “to protect the government most responsible for that network of support.”
The Saudis know what they did, Graham continued, and the U.S. knows what they did, and when the U.S. government takes a position of passivity, or actively shuts down inquiry, that sends a message to the Saudis. “They have continued, maybe accelerated their support for the most extreme form of Islam,” he said, arguing that both al Qaeda and ISIS are “a creation of Saudi Arabia.”
Standing with Graham were Republican Rep.Walter Jones and Democratic Rep. Stephen Lynch, co-sponsors of House Resolution 428, which says declassification of the 28 pages is necessary to provide the American public with the full truth surrounding the 9/11 attacks.’
- Every Presidential Candidate Should Pledge Release of Missing 9/11 Pages
- 9/11 families rip possible removal of NYPD terror report
- Former FBI Special Agent Says The CIA Kept Him From Helping To Stop 9/11
- NYPD chief, 9/11 first responder Steven Bonano dies of blood cancer believed to be tied to Ground Zero
- 9/11 Museum Acquires Truther Art
- 9/11 families: Declassify report’s 28 pages
- Dem: Intel panel won’t let me see 9/11 info
- Criticism of the 9/11 Commission
- 9/11: Press for Truth (Documentary)
‘[…] After shootings last week at a satirical newspaper and a kosher market in Paris, France finds itself grappling anew with a question the United States is still confronting: how to fight terrorism while protecting civil liberties. The answer is acute in a country that is sharply critical of American counterterrorism policies, which many see as a fearful overreaction to 9/11. Already in Europe, counterterrorism officials have arrested dozens of people, and France is mulling tough new antiterrorism laws.
Many European countries, and France in particular, already have robust counterterrorism laws, some of which American authorities have studied as possible models. But the terrorist rampage at the Charlie Hebdo newspaper offices and the Hyper Cacher market prompted calls to go even further. Valérie Pécresse, a minister under former President Nicolas Sarkozy, said France needed its own version of the USA Patriot Act, which gave the United States more authority to collect intelligence and pointed America’s surveillance apparatus at its citizens.’
‘Did the massacre at Charlie Hebdo succeed, in terms of furthering the interests of extreme jihadi al-Qaeda-type Islamic movements? The incident itself is over with the deaths of the murderers, but the degree of their success will only become clear when we see how far French political leaders are lured into an over-reaction.
It was worrying to see Le Monde’s banner headline: “Le 11 Septembre Français.” First, it simply is not true: there were 2,977 victims of the 9/11 attacks and 17 victims in last week’s shootings in Paris. The shock was far greater in the United States than in France because of the visual impact of aircraft crashing into the twin towers, and their spectacular collapse. It is important to keep a sense of proportion about such atrocities, because the perpetrators, whether linked to Islamic State (Isis), al-Qaeda or freelance jihadis, select targets that will guarantee maximum publicity. “The media is half jihad” is a slogan sometime seen on jihadi websites.
Misleading analogies between 7/1 in France and 9/11 in the US should create a sense of foreboding. The most important victory of Osama bin Laden did not come on the day the 19 mainly Saudi hijackers took command of the planes, but in the months and years which followed as President Bush led the US into wars in Iraq and Afghanistan in which American troops fought Muslims. As the US resorted to rendition, the mistreatment and torture of prisoners, expanded security agencies and limited civil rights for its own people it delegitimised itself and acted as recruiting sergeant for al-Qaeda and its clones. If bin Laden had been hiding in the attic of the White House giving instructions to those in the rest of the building he could not have devised a cocktail of measures more likely to aid his cause.’
- Chris Hedges on Roots of Terrorism, Free Speech Hypocrisy & Translating #JeSuisCharlie
- Jeremy Scahill on the Paris Attacks, al-Qaeda Ties & Whether U.S. Drone War in Yemen Will Escalate
- Destructive Western Middle East Policy Provides Fertile Ground for Islamic Radicals
- French leader declares ‘war’ on radical Islam after attacks
- There Are More French Muslims Working for French Security Than for Al Qaeda
- Will France Repeat America’s Mistakes After 9/11?
‘First, a hat tip to Elias Groll, assistant editor at Foreign Policy, whose report just a few hours after the killings on Wednesday at the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo, included this key piece of background on the younger of the two brother suspects:
“Carif Kouachi was previously known to the authorities, as he was convicted by a French court in 2008 of trying to travel to Iraq to fight in that country’s insurgent movement. Kouachi told the court that he wished to fight the American occupation after viewing images of detainee abuse at Abu Ghraib prison.”
The next morning, Amy Goodman of Democracynow.org and Juan Cole (in his blog) also carried this highly instructive aspect of the story of the unconscionable terrorist attack, noting that the brothers were well known to French intelligence; that the younger brother, Cherif, had been sentenced to three years in prison for his role in a network involved in sending volunteer fighters to Iraq to fight alongside al-Qaeda; and that he said he had been motivated by seeing the images of atrocities by U.S. troops at Abu Ghraib.’
‘Law school teacher Marjorie Cohn – president of the National Lawyers Guild – writes:
Obama has killed more people with drones than died on 9/11. Many of those killed were civilians, and only a tiny percentage of the dead were al-Qaeda or Taliban leaders.
She may be right …
The Council on Foreign Relations estimates that U.S. drone strikes outside of Iraq and Afghanistan have killed 3,674 people.
The Bureau of Investigative Journalism reports that up to 4,404 people have been killed – just in Pakistan and Yemen alone – between 2004 and 2014.
While it’s hard to estimate how many additional people have been killed by drone in Iraq and Afghanistan, a December 2012 report by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism found that US and UK forces had carried out over 1,000 drone strikes in Afghanistan over the previous five years. Given thatnumerous people are often killed by each drone strike, it is reasonable to assume that several thousand people have been killed by drone in that country.
And many Iraqis have also been killed by drones … long before ISIS even appeared on the scene. So – altogether – the number of people killed by drone is probably well above five thousand.
In contrast, under 3,000 people were killed on 9/11.’
‘For some time now, I have been analyzing American history in the light of what I have called structural deep events: events, like the JFK assassination, the Watergate break-in, Iran-Contra, or 9/11, which repeatedly involve law-breaking or violence, are mysterious to begin with, are embedded in ongoing covert processes, have political consequences that enlarge covert government, and are subsequently covered up by systematic falsifications in the mainstream media and internal government records.
The more I study these deep events, the more I see suggestive similarities between them, increasing the possibility that they are not unrelated external intrusions on American history, but parts of an endemic process, sharing to some degree or other a common source.
For example, one factor linking Dallas, Watergate, Iran-Contra, and 9/11, has been the involvement in all four deep events of personnel involved in America’s highest-level emergency planning, known since the 1950s as Continuity of Government (COG) planning, or more colloquially inside the Pentagon as “the Doomsday Project.” A few of these actors may have been located at the top, as overseers of the secret COG system. Others – including some I shall talk about today – were located further down in its secret communications network.
I see this planning group as one among many in what I have chosen to call the American deep state, along with agencies like the CIA and NSA, the private groups like Booz Allen Hamilton to which more than half of the US intelligence budget is outsourced, and finally the powerful banks and corporations whose views are well represented in the CIA and NSA. But if only one group among many, the COG planning group is also special, because of its control of and access to a communications channel, not under government control, that can reach deeply into the US social structure.’
Editor’s Note: Nafeez Ahmed recently launched a crowdfunding drive in order to support his great journalism and with the hopeful aim of creating his own investigative journalism collective. Please support him in any way you can. You can find links to more of his work here.
‘Abby Martin interviews investigative journalist, Nafeez Ahmed, about what was not discussed in the torture report and his claims of censorship at the Guardian newspaper, where he used to work.’ (Breaking the Set)
Editor’s Note: The below interview was conducted by Democracy Now in February 2008. Philip Zelikow served as executive director of the 9/11 Commission, Robert Windrem is an investigative journalism who co-authored an analysis on the 9/11 Commission Report, and Michael Ratner is the president of the Center for Constitutional Rights. You can view the full uninterrupted interview here.
- 9/11 Commission Deceived: An Unintentional Work of Fiction Based on Cheney’s Torture Program
- One of the Main Sources for the 9/11 Commission Report was Tortured Until He Agreed to Sign a Confession that He Was Not Even Allowed to Read
- Self-Confessed 9/11 “Mastermind” Also Falsely Confessed to Crimes He Didn’t Commit
- Witness Who Fingered 9/11 “Mastermind” Was Himself Crazy
- 9/11 Commission controversy
- Criticism of the 9/11 Commission
- Torture, Iraq and 9/11
- 9/11 Press for Truth (Documentary)
Editor’s Note: Peter Dale Scott is a poet, a former diplomat, and a former English professor at the University of California, Berkeley. He is the author of many books including Deep Politics and the Death of JFK, The Road to 9/11 and The American Deep State. He also publishes regularly at The Asia Pacific Journal.
- They Tried to Warn Us: Foreign Intelligence Warnings Before 9/11
- The Deafness Before the Storm
- 911 Timeline: Foreign Intelligence Agency Attack Warnings
- Ex-Egyptian minister: We warned US ahead of 9/11
- The Pakistan connection
- Did Certain Foreign Governments Facilitate the 9/11 Attacks?
- September 11th and the Missing 28 Pages of the 9/11 Report
- 9/11 Families Continue Search For Truth Despite Silence From White House
- Never Learn Anything From 9/11
- The 9/11 Bulletin : Interview with Jon Gold
- 9/11: Press for Truth (2006 Documentary)
- 9/11 First Responders Cancer Cases On The Rise
- NSA Whistleblower William Binney Calsl for 9/11 Truth
‘All 19 of the hijackers committed suicide the day they flew the planes into the World Trade Center, Pentagon and a field in Pennsylvania. Almost immediately, the Bush administration announced that the attack was orchestrated by Osama bin Laden, a member of a prominent Saudi family connected to the royal family.
Fifteen of the hijackers were also Saudi nationals. Additionally, members of the Saudi royal family were permitted to leave the country immediately after the attacks, despite having what some sources call “troubling connections” with al-Qaida.
At the end of 2002, a Congressional commission to investigate the events leading up to the attack released the 832-page report, titled “Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001.” When it was made public, 28 pages were kept classified, with the Bush administration citing issues of national security.
Terry Strada believes those pages will complete the story of why and how her husband and 3,00 other Americans were killed. She believes it will also give a better understanding of the nation’s odd alliance with a repressive oil-funded monarchy.’
‘In the weeks ahead of the September 11 attacks in 2001, Egypt warned the Bush administration repeatedly about an imminent large-scale terror attack to be carried out by al-Qaeda operatives on US soil, but the message was ignored, a former high-ranking Egyptian government official said
Habib al-Adly, who served from 1997 to 2011 as minister of the interior for the Mubarak government, said in court testimony that Egypt received intelligence “from inside the al-Qaeda den” that “America would be subject to a huge terror attack.” In testimony last month that was translated and posted online Tuesday by the Middle East Media Research Institute, Adly said the intelligence was verified and analyzed, and then president Hosni Mubarak gave the order to pass it on to the US in May of 2001.
The information was passed to both the CIA and FBI several times, Adly said, as Egyptian intelligence received word that the terror attack was moving from the planning to operation stage.’
- They Tried to Warn Us: Foreign Intelligence Warnings Before 9/11
- 911 Timeline: Foreign Intelligence Agency Attack Warnings
- 911 Timeline: Government Denials that It Was Warned
- 911 Timeline: The Warning Signs
- Two Days Before 9/11, Military Exercise Simulated Suicide Hijack Targeting New York
- PNAC Members Appointed to Bush Administration
- Ron Paul: The U.S. Government Knew 9/11 Was Going to Happen
‘Some thirteen years after the event, the shadow of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in Manhattan and the Pentagon still darkens our world. The legacy of that terrible day has impacted not only our foreign policy, bequeathing to a new generation an apparently endless “war on terrorism,” it also has led directly to what is arguably the most massive assault on our civil liberties since the Alien and Sedition Acts. Getting all the information about what happened that day – and why it happened – is key to understanding the course we have taken since.
This was supposed to have been the purpose of the 9/11 Commission, whose massive report is now looked to as the primary source on the subject. Yet there is another, far more specific investigative report, the one issued by the intelligence committees of both houses of Congress, entitled “Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001.”
If you actually take the time to read the report, all goes along swimmingly (except for occasional redactions) until you get to p. 369, whereupon the text is blacked out for the next twenty-eight pages.
What is in the twenty-eight censored pages? You aren’t allowed to know that, but members of Congress can read them provided they write to the heads of the Senate and House intelligence committees and get permission. If such is granted, they are escorted into a soundproof carefully guarded room in the company of various spooks, where they get to read the material: they aren’t allowed to take notes.
Do you get the impression someone has something to hide?’
- It’s Time to Declassify Those 28 Pages
- Campaign Mounts to Declassify 9/11 Report’s References to Alleged Saudi Involvement
- Senator Bob Graham On Bush-Saudi-9/11 Coverup
- Rep. Massie on the Experience of Reading the 28 Pages
- New questions about FBI probe of Saudis’ post-9/11 exodus
- Shocking cable: US says Saudi donors are chief financiers of al Qaeda
- Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9/11 Commission (Book)
- Report: Netanyahu says 9/11 terror attacks good for Israel
- The Israeli “art student” mystery
- What Did Israel Know in Advance of the 9/11 Attacks?
- 60 Israelis on Tourist Visas Detained Since Sept. 11
- Suspicious Activities Involving Israeli Art Students at DEA Facilities
- The ‘Israeli Art Student’ Files
‘A report that 11 planes were stolen or missing days after Libya’s Tripoli International Airport was overtaken by Islamist militias is unfounded, a State Department official told Washington lawmakers Wednesday while defending U.S. policy in the war-torn country.
[…] The report first appeared in the conservative website Washington Free Beacon, which cited an unnamed U.S. official. It alleged that intelligence agencies had warned that Islamist militias working in concert with al-Qaeda affiliates could use the airliners to launch attacks on U.S. allies in North Africa or Europe. And the attacks would be timed to the 9/11 anniversary.’
Among their questions were: Why had NORAD failed to protect the known terrorist targets, the World Trade Center and the Pentagon? Why did the World Trade Center Towers, including Building 7, completely collapse when no other steel-framed skyscraper had ever previously totally collapsed due to fire? Why did George W Bush stay in a Florida classroom for over 10 minutes after he had been told that the second Tower had been hit?
The film uses archive news footage, press conferences and newspaper clippings to document the unwillingness of the George W. Bush administration to provide answers to the families’ questions or support a full independent investigation. It also shows how the mainstream media avoided asking the politicians the toughest questions.’ (Wikipedia)
Editor’s Note: Press for Truth is easily the best 9/11 documentary out there as it shows the families in their battle against the Bush administration, who were quite reluctant to even have an investigation in the first place, let alone reveal what actually happened. In the end all we got was the pathetic cover-up that is the official 9/11 Commission Report. Even today, 13 years after the event took place, we still have no idea what actually happened on that day and in the days leading up to it. What we do know though is that the opportunity that it presented to the war hawks and others desperate for the American empire to continue to project power around the globe was taken with both hands (despite them making a grand old mess of things). Everything that has happened since then – from the wars, to the rise of ISIS, to the loss of civil liberties – all of it could not have happened without 9/11. That’s why it’s imperative to still question the official narrative and to ultimately press for truth. Below I’m also going to provide some links to what I believe are the best books and research website on the subject.
‘Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the self-proclaimed mastermind behind the Sept. 11 attacks, is facing a military commission at Guantanamo Bay and potentially the death penalty. He was captured in 2003 but his case still hasn’t gone to trial. Last week, Maj. Jason Wright — one of the lawyers defending Mohammed — resigned from the Army. He has accused the U.S. government of “abhorrent leadership” on human rights and due process guarantees and says it is crafting a “show trial.”
[…] Wright tells NPR’s Arun Rath that it’s hard to gain any client’s trust, but it was especially hard with Mohammed. His former client is one of six “high-value detainees” being prosecuted at Guantanamo for offenses that could carry the death penalty. “All six of these men have been tortured by the U.S. government,” he says.
Wright says Mohammed in particular has faced a level of torture “beyond comprehension.” He says his client was waterboarded by the CIA 183 times and subjected to over a week of sleep deprivation; there were threats that his family would be killed. “And those are just the declassified facts that I’m able to actually speak about,” Wright says. Given that treatment, Wright knew it would be hard for Mohammed to trust him.’
- 13 Years On, Will 9/11 Ever Go to Trial?
- Shaker Aamer ‘Beaten’ in Latest Guantanamo Crackdown
- US Navy Pulls Protesting Nurse From Guantanamo
- Could the ‘Torture Report’ help spare the Guantanamo defendants?
- Guantánamo judge bows to prosecution, reinstates joint 5-man 9/11 trial
- FBI Hanky-Panky on Guantanamo—Part of Larger 9/11 Mystery?
- Ex-Guantanamo detainee Moazzam Begg denies terror charges
- CIA secrecy over detention program threatens 9/11 prosecutions, senators warn
- FBI Interrogating Attorneys Of “9/11 Masterminds” Currently On Trial At Gitmo
- Accusation of FBI spying stalls 9/11 hearing
- Torture Didn’t Help Catch bin Laden, Report Finds
- 2013: Legal Clashes at Hearing for Defendants in 9/11 Case
‘The 9/11 Museum has been drawing criticism from first responders upset with the way its exhibits portray those who suffered in the aftermath of the terror attacks. One of the most moving complaints came from an NYPD officer who became ill with cancer after working at Ground Zero.
In a letter addressed to 9/11 Museum President Joe Daniels, Reginald Hilaire expressed his dismay that the exhibit did not properly acknowledge the serious illnesses and deaths among responders.
“There are no listing of names or even a sentence that people died from 9/11 related illnesses,” he wrote. “The federal government has recognized a link with illnesses and work at the WTC and Staten Island landfill, but the 9/11 Museum mentioned very little.”’
‘[…] It is good to remember that the policy that led to this mess was initiated under the Bush Administration, with full cognizance of the possibility that it could result in severe terroristic and destabilizing blowback. It was in 2007 that the U.S. and Saudi Arabia launched what Seymour Hersh, who broke the story in The New Yorker, called “the Redirection.” Under this policy revolution, the U.S. and the Saudis (with Israel’s blessing and prodding) began trying to bolster Sunni radicals in an effort to “contain” the “Shiite resurgence” brought about by the U.S. empowerment of the Shiites in Iraq. It all started in Lebanon.
[…] As reported by Patrick Cockburn, not all of the Saudis embraced such a blowback-inviting policy, so it would be more accurate to call it a victory for the Prince Bandar bin Sultan line. The fact that U.S. policymakers concluded that beleaguered Iran, with its long track record of not attacking a single country, is more of a danger than Sunni radicals, like the ones responsible for 9/11 and every other Al Qaeda attack, is an indication of just how little our overlords care about actually protecting us, as compared to pursuing regional power politics.
[…] Some of the radical Sunnis the U.S. has bolstered in Syria (namely, ISIS) have now crossed over into Iraq, conquered much of the northwest, and may soon take Baghdad, Maliki’s capital. I imagine this has put plenty of “fear” into his government: mission accomplished. Although, I don’t know how much “incentive” they’ll have to “cooperate” when they’re all dead or in exile.
[…] They have indeed outsmarted them, and it has indeed been ugly. Obama and the Saudis ramped up in Syria the same policy that Bush and the Saudis started pursuing in Lebanon, and the result was the same but worse. Salafi psychos in Syria, as in Lebanon, were able to get their hands on plenty of U.S. and Saudi aid. And through the course of the U.S.-supported bloody rebellion in Syria, ISIS acquired experience, recruits, arms, and territory, which they used to launch their conquest in Iraq.’
‘Nearly 13 years after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the extent of Saudi involvement in the deaths of almost 3,000 people remains unclear — but according to members of Congress and the families of victims, information about this has been suppressed ever since the publication of a 2002 congressional investigation into the plot.
Prior to the release of the final report of the Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001, the Bush administration classified a 28-page section in the name of national security.
Though speculations, accusations, and denials have swirled around these pages over the past decade, the call for their declassification has steadily grown since December 2013, when House Representatives Walter Jones (R-NC) and Stephen Lynch (D-MA) introduced Resolution 428, a two-page document urging President Obama to release them to the public. Nine other representatives from both parties have co-sponsored the resolution.’
‘America has entered its third great era: the post-constitutional one. In the first, in the colonial years, a unitary executive, the King of England, ruled without checks and balances, allowing no freedom of speech, due process or privacy when it came to protecting his power.
In the second, the principles of the Enlightenment and an armed rebellion were used to push back the king’s abuses. The result was a new country and a new constitution with a Bill of Rights expressly meant to check the government’s power. Now we are wading into the shallow waters of a third era, a time when that government is abandoning the basic ideas that saw our nation through centuries of challenges far more daunting than terrorism. Those ideas—enshrined in the Bill of Rights—are disarmingly concise. Think of them as the haiku of a genuine people’s government.
Deeper, darker waters lie ahead and we seem drawn down into them. For here there be monsters.’
‘America’s longest war. Much more National Security Agency surveillance. An alphabet soup of new government departments and agencies. Long security lines at airports. All those things happened in response to the 9/11 al Qaeda attacks on New York and the Pentagon that forever changed U.S. security perceptions and practices. Now a commission created to examine what happened then says we need to do more now to protect ourselves.
“The ‘generational struggle’ against terrorism described in ‘The 9/11 Commission Report’ is far from over,” the panel said this week in reference to its assessment a decade earlier. “Rather, it is entering a new and dangerous phase, and America cannot afford to let down its guard.” Its bottom line assessment? “Strenuous counterterrorism efforts will remain a fact of our national life for the foreseeable future.”‘
- 9/11 Commission authors outline never ending war on terror
- U.S. government agents ‘directly involved’ in most high-profile US terror plots
- Blacklisted: The Secret Government Rulebook For Labeling You a Terrorist
- Thomas Kean & Lee Hamilton Call for The Release of the 28 Redacted Pages
- After 9/11: The Stories We Tell and the Stories We Don’t
- Coalition proposes ballot referendum to investigate 9/11 (Video)
- Mother of 9/11 Victim: “These buildings were designed to come straight down if anything happened” (eh?)
- Conspiracy theories and other dangerous ideas: Interview with Cass Sunstein (Sunstein info)
- Rings of Steel: How 9/11 Changed the way Cities are Planned
‘More than 2,500 Ground Zero rescuers and responders have come down with cancer, and a growing number are seeking compensation for their illnesses, The Post has learned. The grim toll has skyrocketed from the 1,140 cancer cases reported last year.
In its latest tally, the World Trade Center Health Program at Mount Sinai Hospital counts 1,655 responders with cancer among the 37,000 cops, hard hats, sanitation workers, other city employees and volunteers it monitors, officials told The Post.
The tragic sum rises to 2,518 when firefighters and EMTs are added. The FDNY, which has its own WTC health program, said Friday it counts 863 members with cancers certified for 9/11-related treatment.’
- 9/11 First Responders Betrayed By The Government
- Wall Street traders want 9/11 money
- EPA Misled Public on 9/11 Pollution: White House ordered false assurances on air quality, report says
- Christie Whitman lied about Ground Zero air quality, 9/11 victims’ lawyers say
- Ground Zero Hazards: Environmental and Health Impacts of the WTC Bombing
Editor’s Note: The Steve Clemens piece mentioned by Thom Hartmann in these videos is titled “‘Thank God for the Saudis': ISIS, Iraq, and the Lessons of Blowback“. And if you’re interested, you can download a copy of the film “Charlie Wilson’s War” here.
- Chiquita Is Blocking a 9/11 Victims’ Bill
- Fyffes to merge with Chiquita and create world’s biggest banana company
- Chiquita Sues to Block Release of Files on Colombia Terrorist Payments
- Chiquita Banana To Face Colombia Torture Claim
- Families Sue Chiquita for More Than 4,000 Murders in Colombia
- Fronting for Paramilitaries: Holder, Chiquita and Colombia
- Terrorism and Bananas in Colombia
- Chiquita admits to paying terrorists
- United Fruit Company
A wave of Wall Street stockbrokers and traders are coming down with cancers blamed on the toxic dust and smoke of 9/11. They’re joining ill Ground Zero first-responders in seeking payments from the $2.7 billion federal September 11th Victim Compensation Fund. Of 622 cancer claims approved so far, the fund has awarded $15.5 million to 39 victims, a spokeswoman told The Post.
Officials would not give a breakdown of cancer victims, but 10,800 downtown workers make up the second-largest group of registered claimants after 39,500 Ground Zero responders. There are another 16,600 in smaller categories such as residents, students, child-care and health-care workers. Finance workers engulfed in dust and debris from the Twin Towers’ collapse say the attacks — and returning to Wall Street a week later, when officials insisted it was safe — triggered their diseases.
The US government’s troubled military trials of terrorism suspects were dealt another blow on Monday when proceedings were halted after an allegation surfaced that the Federal Bureau of Investigation turned a member of a 9/11 defendant’s defense team into a secret informant. Judge James Pohl, the army colonel overseeing the controversial military commission at Guantánamo, gaveled a hearing out of session after barely 30 minutes on Monday morning, following the revelation of a motion filed by the defense stipulating that the FBI approached an unidentified member of the team during the course of an investigation into how a manifesto by accused 9/11 architect Khalid Shaikh Mohammed found its way to the media.
Defense attorneys argued the government plunged them into a potential conflict of interest, as they would need to potentially defend themselves against a leak investigation, risking their ability to put their clients’ legal needs ahead of their own. They implored Pohl to investigate, and if necessary, assign their clients with new independent counsel to advise the defendants about the existence and implications of conflict of interest. That could be a lengthy process – potentially the next delay for a proceeding that has yet to get out of the pretrial stage nearly two years after the latest incarnation of the 9/11 military trials began.