Editor’s Note: Essentially, the U.S. has launched over 1000 air strikes, some of which have missed their intended targets by nearly 100 miles. Also, the Islamic State controls pretty much the same territory it did before the U.S. intervention, give or take a border village here and there. At least the weapons companies are happy.
‘The American war against the Islamic State has become the most opaque conflict the United States has undertaken in more than two decades, a fight that’s so underreported that U.S. officials and their critics can make claims about progress, or lack thereof, with no definitive data available to refute or bolster their positions.
The result is that it’s unclear what impact more than 1,000 airstrikes on Iraq and Syria have had during the past four months. That confusion was on display at a House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing earlier this week, where the topic – “Countering ISIS: Are We Making Progress?” – proved to be a question without an answer.
“Although the administration notes that 60-plus countries having joined the anti-ISIS campaign, some key partners continue to perceive the administration’s strategy as misguided,” Rep. Ed Royce, R-Calif., the committee’s chairman, said in his opening statement at the hearing, using a common acronym for the Islamic State. “Meanwhile, there are grave security consequences to allowing ISIS to control a territory of the size of western Iraq and eastern Syria.”
The dearth of information by which to judge the conflict is one of the difficulties for those trying to track progress in it. The U.S. military, which started out announcing every air mission almost as soon as it ended, now publishes roundups of airstrikes three times a week. Those releases often don’t specify which strikes happened on what days or even whether a targeted site was successfully hit. McClatchy has discovered that in some cases, the location given for bombings has been inaccurate by nearly 100 miles.’
Editor’s Note: The interview with investigative journalist Seymour Hersh begins at 2:56
- Seymour Hersh: The Redirection
- Potential Turkish Role in Syria Chemical Strike That Almost Sparked U.S. Bombing: Interview with Seymour Hersh
- Seymour Hersh: White House Lied About Syrian Gas Attack
- The Dark Side of Camelot: Journalist Seymour Hersh discusses his controversial book on JFK
- Seymour Hersh on Obama, NSA, the ‘pathetic’ American media and the bin Laden raid: “Not one word of it is true”
‘Israel continues to interact with Syrian rebels in the Golan Heights and allow them to cross the border, according to a new UN report corroborated by a VICE News team that visited the area in November, uncovering additional incidents beyond what has been described by the UN.
Israel has occupied the Golan Heights since the Six-Day War in 1967, when it captured it from Syria. In 1974, a UN peacekeeping mission, known as UNDOF, was established to police a 50-mile-long disengagement zone between the Israeli “Alpha” and Syrian “Bravo” lines. At the disengagement zone’s narrowest southern points, the distance between the two lines can be less than a kilometer.’
‘Syria has filed a formal complaint with the United Nations about the attack [in and around Damascus airport], saying they believe the Netanyahu government attacked to try to distract attention from the early elections. Syria’s Foreign Ministry is pushing for immediate sanctions.
What was attacked is still a subject of no small speculation, as the rebel Free Syrian Army (FSA) said it was conceivable the sites were Hezbollah arms dumps, though they appeared to have no evidence supporting that.
By contrast, Lebanese TV was reporting that the sites hit were “crucial intelligence-linked locations” that Syria’s military was letting Iran use. Syrian state media said Russian anti-aircraft defenses were attacked, and Israel is refusing to either confirm or deny the attacks.’
- Syria: Israeli jets bomb army facilities near Damascus airport
- Suspected Israeli war jets strike near Damascus airport
- Israel’s air strikes hit Russian top-line air defense missiles sent to Syria & Hizballah
- Syria to UN: Israel struck targets to distract from coalition breakup
- Israel strikes against Syria may be linked to Iranian activity
- Israel bombs Syria in attacks probably aimed at Hezbollah
- Blamed for Syria strikes, Israel vows to stop arms to ‘terrorists’
- Russia demands Israeli explanation of air strikes in Syria
‘President Barack Obama has stressed that the U.S.-led coalition fight against the Islamic State can be won without “boots on the ground.” But it depends on who’s wearing the boots.
Thousands of private security contractors, who played critical, below-the-radar and at times controversial roles in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, are being asked to consider joining this latest battle against Islamic extremists in Iraq and Syria and possibly elsewhere in the Middle East. What specific jobs they will fill, and which departments or countries will be paying for their services, remains to be seen. But the demand for their considerable and varied expertise is expected to be high, and that’s welcome news for both the contracting companies and politicians, according to policy advisers and industry experts.
“I think Obama’s promise not to send ground troops to Iraq and Syria, combined with the threat there, incentivizes the administration to turn to contractors because there are such fewer political risks,” says George Washington University law professor Laura A. Dickinson, author of “Outsourcing War and Peace: Preserving Public Values in a World of Privatized Foreign Affairs.”’
- Pentagon Courts Contractors For ISIS Ground War
- Blackwater Founder Proposes a Pentagon Makeover
- Pentagon Presses Contractors to Innovate
- Jeremy Scahill: Blackwater Execs Remain Free as Guards Convicted for Killing 14 Iraqis in Massacre
- Defense Contractors Are Making a Killing
- Blackwater Founder: We Could Stop ISIS
- Blackwater: A case study of contractor scandals
- Blackwater Threatened To Kill State Deptartment Investigator
- Erik Prince: Out of Blackwater and Into China
- How Erik Prince, Founder Of Blackwater, Will Help China Subjugate Africa
- Blackwater Founder Erik Prince Insists He’s Not A War Profiteer
- Former CEO reveals Blackwater worked as ‘virtual extension of the CIA’
- Jeremy Scahill on Iraq: A very private war (2007)
- Outsourcing War and Peace: Preserving Public Values in a World of Privatized Foreign Affairs (Book)
- The Modern Mercenary: Private Armies and What They Mean for World Order (Book)
‘Reese Erlich’s informative and insightful book Inside Syria (Prometheus, 2014) brings to mind the Greek myth of a vast maze under the palace at Knossos, with one exception: King Minos’ labyrinth on Crete concealed a single Minotaur, whereas Syria is teeming with the beasts.
Erlich has spent almost three decades reporting from the Middle East, and he brings his considerable knowledge of the region into this analysis of the Syrian civil war. A winner of the Peabody Award and the Society of Professional Journalists’ explanatory journalism award for his radio documentary “Inside the Syrian Revolution,” Erlich combines on-the-ground reporting with an encyclopedic background in the region’s history. It is a combination that is particularly useful for a subject as complex and nuanced as the current war—one that has gradually drawn in Lebanon, Israel, Turkey, Iran, and the monarchies of the Persian Gulf, along with the United States, France, and Britain.
The mainstream media generally considers history an afterthought, which explains why it does such an awful job reporting on the Middle East. Journalists like Erlich, Robert Fisk, and Patrick Cockburn understand that the history of the region and current events are one and the same—a sort of paraphrase of William Faulkner’s observation that history is as much about the present as the past.’
‘Vice President Joe Biden spent four hours today in private meetings with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. The topic: how to impose regime change on Syria, Turkey’s war-torn neighbor to the south.
Publicly, the US has been in favor of regime change for years, and had been backing “moderate” rebel factions on and off in hopes of installing one of them.
Since entering a direct war with ISIS in Syria two months ago, the US war focus has been on ISIS and other rebel factions, strikes which the US concedes are benefiting the Assad government.
Over the past few weeks, the US has been reiterating, over and over, that their policy is regime change, but their actions in the ISIS war are supporting the exact opposite, and when asked point blank, President Obama conceded earlier this week that no actions were being taken to try to remove Assad from power at this point.’
- Biden, Erdogan Discuss Syrian Regime Change
- Assad: Real Cooperation Needed to Defeat ISIS in Syria
- Assad Benefiting From US War on ISIS, Hagel Admits
- U.S.-led strikes have killed 910 people in Syria
- Syrian air force strikes increasing, civilians killed
- Report: ‘Moderate’ Rebels Abandon Syrian City of Aleppo
- White House Insists Syria Policy ‘Clear’ and ‘Working’
- Foreign Fighters Flock To Syria
- The Syrian Labyrinth: A review of Reese Erlich’s new book
Antiwar Voices Absent from Corporate TV News Ahead of U.S. Attacks on Iraq and Syria: Interview with Peter Hart
‘A new analysis of corporate TV news has found there was almost no debate about whether the United States should go to war in Iraq and Syria. The group Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting found that of the more than 200 guests who appeared on network shows to discuss the issue, just six voiced opposition to military action. The report, titled “Debating How — Not Whether — to Launch a New War,” examines a two-week period in September when U.S. involvement in Iraq and Syria dominated the airwaves. The report also finds that on the high-profile Sunday talk shows, out of 89 guests, there was just one antiwar voice — Katrina vanden Heuvel, editor of The Nation. We speak to Peter Hart, activism director at FAIR.’ (Democracy Now!)
- Debating How–Not Whether–to Launch a New War
- No Debate and the New War: Study finds little opposition to US attacks on Iraq, Syria
- The Sunday Shows Are Completely Infatuated With War
- Who’s Paying the Pro-War Pundits?
- Legendary Talk Show Host Phil Donahue on the Silencing of Antiwar Voices in U.S. Media
- If You Were An Iraq War Critic, You’re Probably Not Being Asked To Go On TV
- Lie by Lie: A Timeline of How We Got Into Iraq
‘The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff estimates the U.S.-led fight against Islamic militants in Iraq and Syria will last up to four years.
Army Gen. Martin Dempsey made the estimate on Wednesday during an interview at Atlantic Media’s Defense One conference in Washington, D.C. about the fight against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, or ISIS.
The U.S. started launching airstrikes against ISIS in Iraq and Syria to thwart the organization’s advances in some areas, though the militants still control vast parts of northern and western Iraq and eastern Syria.
Under Secretary of Intelligence Mike Vickers later agreed with Dempsey’s estimate warning about the time it will take to train a force inside Iraq and Syria to defeat ISIS.
Dempsey first mentioned the timeline in regards to the challenges the military faces in funding the many conflicts across the globe. He listed the deployment of more American troops to Europe and Africa, as well as the “protracted probably three or four year campaign in the Middle East.”‘
‘As the war against the Islamic State in Syria has fallen into even more chaos –partially due to the United States government’s increasing involvement there – the White House’s bright new idea seems to be to ramping up the involvement of the intelligence agency that is notorious for making bad situations worse. As the Washington Post reported late Friday, “The Obama administration has been weighing plans to escalate the CIA’s role in arming and training fighters in Syria, a move aimed at accelerating covert U.S. support to moderate rebel factions while the Pentagon is preparing to establish its own training bases.”
Put aside for a minute that the Central Intelligence Agency has been secretly arming Syrian rebels with automatic rifles, rocket-propelled grenades, ammunition and antitank weapons since at least 2012 – and with almost nothing to show for it. Somehow the Post neglected to cite a front-page New York Times article from just one month ago alerting the public to the existence of a still-classified internal CIA study admitting that arming rebels with weapons has rarely – if ever – worked.
The Times cited the most well-known of CIA failures, including the botched Bay of Pigs invasion and the arming of the Nicaraguan contra rebels that led to the disastrous Iran-Contra scandal. Even the agency’s most successful mission – slowly bleeding out the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in the 1980s by arming the mujahideen – paved the way for the worst terrorist attack on the US in its history.’
- C.I.A. Study of Covert Aid Fueled Skepticism About Helping Syrian Rebels
- U.S. weighs expanded CIA training, arming of Syrian allies struggling against Assad
- Spies Warned White House: Don’t Hit Al Qaeda in Syria
- Syrian rebels defect to Al-Qaeda after receiving weapons from U.S. to fight ISIS, Assad
- ISIS and al-Qaida reach accord in Syria
- US Senate passes bill to authorise arms and training for Syrian rebels
- CIA Privately Skeptical About New Syria Strategy, Sources Say
- Ongoing “Covert” Training of Syrian Rebels: But Is It Still Covert . . . , And, If So, Why?
- C.I.A. Said to Aid in Steering Arms to Syrian Opposition (2012)
- Legacy of Ashes: The History of the CIA (Book)
- Killing Hope: US Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II (Book)
There were nearly 10,000 terrorist attacks in 2013, a 44% increase from the previous year, the Global Terrorism Index 2014 report added.
The report said militant groups Islamic State, al-Qaeda, Boko Haram and the Taliban were behind most of the deaths.
Iraq was the country most affected by terrorism, the report said.
The report by the Institute for Economics and Peace says that nearly 18,000 people died from terrorist attacks in 2013.
“Not only is the intensity of terrorism increasing, its breadth is increasing as well,” it notes.’
‘While Congress may soon debate the ongoing US wars in Iraq and Syria, a new FAIR study shows that at the critical moments leading up to the escalation of US military action, mainstream media presented almost no debate at all.
The study of key TV news discussion programs from September 7 through 21 reveals that guests who opposed war were scarce.
The study evaluated discussion and debate segments on the Sunday talk shows (CNN’s State of the Union, CBS‘s Face the Nation, ABC‘s This Week,Fox News Sunday and NBC‘s Meet the Press), the PBS NewsHour and a sample of cable news programs that feature roundtables and interview segments (CNN‘s Situation Room, Fox News Channel‘s Special Reportand MSNBC’s Hardball).’
‘Millions of YouTube viewers have been captivated by the ‘Syrian hero boy‘ who manages to rescue a little girl while under gunfire. Now a group of Norwegian filmmakers have told BBC Trending they are behind it. They say it was filmed on location in Malta this summer with the intention of being presented as real.
Lars Klevberg, a 34-year-old film director based in Oslo, wrote a script after watching news coverage of the conflict in Syria. He says he deliberately presented the film as reality in order to generate a discussion about children in conflict zones.
“If I could make a film and pretend it was real, people would share it and react with hope,” he said. “We shot it in Malta in May this year on a set that was used for other famous movies like Troy and Gladiator,” Klevberg said. “The little boy and girl are professional actors from Malta. The voices in the background are Syrian refugees living in Malta.”‘
‘Dispelling rumors of his injury or death, the leader of the militant group that calls itself the Islamic State issued a new call to arms on Thursday in a 17-minute speech, belittling President Obama’s plan to send more soldiers to Iraq and urging disciples to “erupt volcanoes of jihad everywhere.”
An audio recording of the speech by the leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, was distributed online, along with Arabic, English and Russian transcripts. It was first reported by the SITE Intelligence Group, a jihadist monitoring organization.
Mr. Baghdadi’s speech appeared to end days of rumors that he had been killed or grievously wounded in an airstrike carried out in northwestern Iraq on Saturday by the American-led coalition fighting the Islamic State.’
‘Militant leaders from the Isis and al-Qaeda terrorist groups have agreed to stop fighting each other in order to join against their opponents.
Isis, which calls itself the Islamic State (Isis), and al-Qaeda’s Syrian affiliate, Jabhat al-Nusra, have been engaged in bitter fighting for more than a year in an attempt to dominate the bloody rebellion against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
The accord set between the extremists groups in northern Syria last week could spell problems for the US-led coalition in its fight against Isis, as it complements its air strikes by arming “moderate” rebel factions to fight on the ground.
Now, if the two terrorist groups fulfil their agreement and unite as one force, this would further weaken US-backed rebels – who are viewed as relatively disorganised.’
‘A new survey conducted by the Arab Centre for Research and Policy Studies at the Doha Institute shows that 85 per cent of Arabs polled hold negative views of the Islamic State (ISIS).
The survey results also suggest that while the majority of Arabs, 59 per cent, support the aims of the international military campaign against ISIS, only 22 per cent of the respondents expressed “unqualified confidence in the ability of the US-led coalition to fulfil its mission”.
According to As-Sabeel newspaper, the survey is considered to be the first of its kind regarding ISIS and took a wide-ranging look at the phenomenon.’
‘A nine-year-old girl has become the star of a YouTube comedy that depicts with bittersweet humour the harsh reality of everyday life in rebel-held areas of Syria’s Aleppo.
Rasha plays the role of “Umm Abdo al-Halabiya”, a housewife who must make do in a city devastated by more than three years of violence, despite daily bombings and severe shortages.
The 30-episode eponymous show, shot on location in the city which was once Syria’s economic hub, stars only children playing adult roles and has been viewed by tens of thousands of Internet users.
Umm Abdo rants against President Bashar al-Assad, takes swipes at insurgents who have been trying to oust him and also mocks Syria’s often overbearing social norms.’
‘Though publicly administration officials continue to deny any formal review of the ISIS war strategy or any change in policy, privately there are growing numbers conceding that a series high-level meetings are in progress looking to totally revamp the Syria war policy.
In particular, officials say, there is a recognition that the previous Iraq-first strategy is untenable, and much of the push also seems to be toward ousting the Assad government alongside the war against ISIS, against al-Qaeda, and against other, miscellaneous factions therein.
Previously, the administration was of a mind to defer attacks on the Assad government until the creation of a new “moderate” rebel faction, late in 2015 or after, that might serve as a potential replacement.
Gulf Arab nations involved in the US war are keen to see Assad ousted, and that’s at least part of the force driving them toward a faster regime change, with officials saying they want such a move within the next 6-12 months.’
- US Will Focus on Ousting Assad ‘to Defeat ISIS’
- Sources: Obama seeks new Syria strategy review to deal with ISIS, al-Assad
- Syria ‘Moderates’ Say US Strikes Fueled Backlash Against Them
- Southern Tip of Syria Last Holdout for Pro-West ‘Moderate’ Rebels
- U.S.-led strikes have killed 865 people in Syria, 50 civilians: monitor
- Syrian Rebel Leader: US Strikes Undermining Rebellion
- Inside the CIA’s Syrian Rebels Vetting Machine
- Spies Warned White House: Don’t Hit Al Qaeda in Syria
- Syria Surrounds Aleppo, Another Blow to US War Strategy
- Hagel’s Syria Memo
- Hagel Blasts Syria Strategy in Memo
- Syrian government forces retake gas field from Islamic State
- ISIS Seizes Another Key Syrian Gas Field
- Assad’s Syria truncated, battered but defiant
- Foreign fighters flow to Syria
- Syrian opposition-in-exile re-elects Qatar-backed leader
‘About 13.6 million people, equivalent to the population of London, have been displaced by conflicts in Syria and Iraq, and many are without food or shelter as winter starts, the U.N. refugee agency UNHCR said on Tuesday.
Amin Awad, UNHCR’s director for the Middle East and North Africa, said the world was becoming numb to the refugees’ needs.
“Now when we talk about a million people displaced over two months, or 500,000 overnight, the world is just not responding,” he told reporters in Geneva.
The 13.6 million include 7.2 million displaced within Syria – an increase from a long-held U.N. estimate of 6.5 million – as well as 3.3 million Syrian refugees abroad.
In Iraq, 1.9 million have been displaced this year by tribal fighting and the advance of Islamic State, adding to 1 million previously displaced, and 190,000 have left the country to seek safety.’
‘Local ceasefires in Syria may be the best way to ease the suffering of civilians in the absence of a political solution to the three-and-a-half year conflict, researchers from the London School of Economics said on Monday.
In a report that looked at more than 35 local negotiations across Syria since the start of the crisis, they said the international community should support such solutions, even if they have sometimes been problematic.
While two rounds of peace talks between the government and the political opposition this year failed to halt the war, local ceasefires have brought some relief.’
- Syria’s Assad: UN’s Aleppo cease-fire proposal is worth studying
- Local ‘truces’ in Syria offer hope, generate criticism
- Fleeing Syrians face ‘new level of hopelessness’
- Syria’s War: Through the eyes of the people
- A few thousand Syrian Christians remain to defy militants
- Syria says 11,000 freed in prisoner amnesty
- Aleppo girl is star of YouTube show on Syria war
- Self-ruling region in Syria issues women’s rights decree
- The ‘Syrian Girl’ who posts her views on ISIS, al-Assad, and the US
- Photos of Syria From Space Put the Country’s Civil War in Perspective
‘The Republicans took control of the Senate in Tuesday’s elections, but much more important than which party took control is the nature of the incoming Senators from the new ruling party.
It’s not an influx of Tea Party members, reluctant to waste US funds on overseas adventures and suspicious of federal power, but rather a series of hawks in the model of Sen. Lindsey Graham (R – SC) that seized the reins of power last night.
The new senators are typified by Jodi Ernst (R – IA) and Tom Cotton (R – AR), who campaigned heavy on escalating the ISIS war in Iraq and Syria, as well as being more hawkish at essentially every opportunity.”
- Obama foreign policy faces new challenge
- Obama faces new Congress critical of his foreign policy
- The rise of Joni Ernst — and the return of the Bush-era GOP
- The GOP sweep is no victory for Netanyahu
- Obama Seeks War Authorization for ISIS Conflict Before New Congress Takes Over
- Turkish Media: Democrat losses in Senate might be good news for coping with crisis in Syria
‘It is not just air strikes that the jihadists of Islamic State have to watch out for. Kurdish forces have received a boost from an unlikely source — Dutch and German Hell’s Angels.
Western governments avoided putting boots on the ground but that has not deterred Ron from the Netherlands, one of several members of the No Surrender biker gang who have joined the anti-Isis struggle.
A group has reportedly also travelled to the region from the Cologne-based Median Empire biker gang, made up of Kurdish Germans.’
‘In recent media appearances, ex-chief of the CIA’s bin Laden unit, Michael Scheuer, came out strongly against the latest American military campaign in Iraq. Echoing past criticisms, thoroughly voiced in his books Through Our Enemies Eyes, Marching Toward Hell, and Imperial Hubris, Scheuer offers a case against the new Iraq intervention based on his 20+ years of experience as a US intelligence officer, as well as an intimate and detailed knowledge of Islamic extremism.
In Scheuer’s view, another US military intervention in the Middle East against groups such as the Islamic State (IS) will not meet its stated objectives, and will fall into the same errors made in past operations of a similar character. Continuing this policy, he says, will only help to motivate and radicalize Muslims the world over, and will provide exactly the impetus IS needs to step up their drive to establish a long-sought Islamic caliphate in the Levant region.’
- Obama leads his coalition of Arab tyrants into another losing, Islamist-boosting war
- Michael Scheuer: ISIS Could Not Ask For Any Greater Gift Than The One Obama’s Giving Them
- Slightly Fewer Back ISIS Military Action vs. Past Actions
- Poll: Public supports strikes in Iraq, Syria
- U.S. Falling Into the Islamic State’s Trap
- The Beheadings Are Bait
- Americans Are Sick of all of the Failed U.S. Wars
‘The Central Intelligence Agency has run guns to insurgencies across the world during its 67-year history — from Angola to Nicaragua to Cuba. The continuing C.I.A. effort to train Syrian rebels is just the latest example of an American president becoming enticed by the prospect of using the spy agency to covertly arm and train rebel groups.
An internal C.I.A. study has found that it rarely works.
The still-classified review, one of several C.I.A. studies commissioned in 2012 and 2013 in the midst of the Obama administration’s protracted debate about whether to wade into the Syrian civil war, concluded that many past attempts by the agency to arm foreign forces covertly had a minimal impact on the long-term outcome of a conflict. They were even less effective, the report found, when the militias fought without any direct American support on the ground.’
- Cenk Uygur: C.I.A. A Disaster Factory For Decades Yet Here We Go Again
- Classified CIA report finds that arming rebels rarely works, so where does that leave us with Syria?
- Would arming Syria’s rebels have stopped the Islamic State?
- Arms Airlift to Syria Rebels Expands, With Aid From C.I.A.
- The Reagan Doctrine: Third World Rollback
- U.S. Presidents wit doctrines named after them
- Joint Chiefs Chairman: Ground Role for Troops in Iraq Likely
- U.S. Defense Secretary Hagel: Fight to defeat Islamic State is long-term
- Panetta: Obama needs ‘the heart of a warrior’
- McCain: ISIS ‘is winning’
- Rice: ISIS fight ‘is going to take time’
- Rep. McKeon: Generals Want Ground Troops for Iraq War
- Iraq Clears Aussie Troops for ISIS Ground War
- David Cameron: Troops face ‘generational struggle’
- George W. Bush: I Wouldn’t Have Brought all the Troops Home from Iraq
- Boehner: ‘Somebody’s boots have to be on the ground’ to defeat ISIS
- Top Obama Official: This Will Not Be Another Iraq War
- Will American Ground Troops Be Sent to Fight ISIS?
- Dempsey on Ground Troops: Whatever It Takes, Ideally Wouldn’t Involve U.S. Troops
- Cameron warns Isis air strikes not enough to defeat ‘bunch of psychopathic terrorists’
- Obama vs. Generals: Odierno Says ISIS War Needs Ground Troops
- General Hints Broader Military Effort May Be Needed to Fight ISIS
- Jeremy Scahill: What ISIS Campaign Will Look Like on the Ground
- The Pleasant Fiction of “No Boots on the Ground”
- Battle rages for control of Syria’s Kobane
- Will the West take ‘last-minute’ action to save Kobane?
- ISIS Adds Reinforcements as Kobani Offensive Continues
- Kurds urge more air strikes in Kobani; monitor warns of defeat
- Kurds Still Hold Kobani’s Central Square, But Defeat Looms
- Kurds mourn in Turkey for Kobane battle ‘martyrs’
- U.N. says thousands likely to be massacred if jihadists take Kobani
- Up to 700 trapped in Syrian Kurdish town of Kobane, UN says
- ISIS Seizes Large Parts of Kobani as US Increases Strikes
- Kurds bury Kobani dead in makeshift graves over border
- Kurdish Ammo Runs Low in Kobani as Turkey Controls Exit
- Kerry: IS advance on Kobani will not deter coalition
- Kerry: Stopping Kobani Takeover ‘Not a Priority’
‘In transmitting President Richard Nixon’s orders for a “massive” bombing of Cambodia in 1969, Henry Kissinger said, “Anything that flies on everything that moves”. As Barack Obama ignites his seventh war against the Muslim world since he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, the orchestrated hysteria and lies make one almost nostalgic for Kissinger’s murderous honesty.
As a witness to the human consequences of aerial savagery – including the beheading of victims, their parts festooning trees and fields – I am not surprised by the disregard of memory and history, yet again. A telling example is the rise to power of Pol Pot and his Khmer Rouge, who had much in common with today’s Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS). They, too, were ruthless medievalists who began as a small sect. They, too, were the product of an American-made apocalypse, this time in Asia.’
‘[…] At this point, it is literally inconceivable to imagine the U.S. not at war. It would be shocking if that happened in our lifetime. U.S. officials are now all but openly saying this. “Endless War” is not dramatic rhetorical license but a precise description of America’s foreign policy.
It’s not hard to see why. A state of endless war justifies ever-increasing state power and secrecy and a further erosion of rights. It also entails a massive transfer of public wealth to the “homeland security” and weapons industry (which the US media deceptively calls the “defense sector”).
[…] It was designed from the start to be endless. Both Bush and Obama officials have explicitly said that the war will last at least a generation. The nature of the “war,” and the theories that have accompanied it, is that it has no discernible enemy and no identifiable limits. More significantly, this “war” fuels itself, provides its own inexhaustible purpose, as it is precisely the policies justified in the name of Stopping Terrorism that actually ensure its spread (note how Panetta said the new U.S. war would have to include Libya, presumably to fight against those empowered by the last U.S. war there just 3 years ago).’
- Hillary Clinton: US-ISIS fight a ‘long-term struggle’
- Former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta Predicts ’30-Year War’ Against ISIS
- Pentagon: ISIS campaign could last years
- Boehner’s comments on ground troops reflect views of GOP lawmakers
- Syria Becomes the 7th Predominantly Muslim Country Bombed by 2009 Nobel Peace Laureate
- Politifact: Obama has bombed more nations than Bush
- 6 big issues where Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama disagree
- Washington gets explicit: its ‘war on terror’ is permanent
- Plan for hunting terrorists signals U.S. intends to keep adding names to kill lists
- Pentagon Spec Ops Chief Sees ’10 to 20′ More Years of War Against al-Qaida
- Quick Reactions to Extraordinary Senate Armed Services Committee Hearing on the AUMF
- The Bin Laden Dividend
- After Osama bin Laden’s Death, an End to ‘Bad Guys’
- Cause and effect in the War on Terror
- Bad for the good guy, good for the bad guys and really good for the money guys
- The terrorist threat continues to be exaggerated to spawn a massive and costly Security State
- Syria-to-Ukraine Wars Send U.S. Defense Stocks to Records
‘Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Monday that military force is a necessary part of the “long-term struggle” between the U.S. and the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS or ISIL), according to a report.
Clinton said at an event in Ottawa that because ISIS’s mission is “expansionary” in nature — and because the group seems interested in embedding militants in the countries it opposes — she supports military action.’