‘Nick Dearden, Director of NGO Global Justice Now, talks about what is really going on at the summit in the Bavarian town of Schloss Elmau. As the leaders of the richest countries on the globe meet to discuss improving the world, are they really just planning policies to benefit elites in Western countries? Plus what is The New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition and how is it making it easier for big corporations to buy up land in developing countries.’ (Going Underground)
‘[…] Okinawa makes up just 0.6% of Japan’s land mass but, as the locals will never tire of telling you, it hosts over 70% of the US bases in Japan.
The people of Okinawa are weary of the 70 years of “semi-occupation”. They have long complained of the noise and danger from US planes and helicopters flying day and night.
Most of all they complain of the young men of the US Marine Corps, who are seen as drunken, violent and a threat to Okinawan women.
In fact the statistics speak otherwise – the incidence of rape, murder and other crimes by American personnel in Okinawa is low.
But a small number of horrific cases have done huge harm – in particular the 1995 gang rape of a 13-year-old Okinawan schoolgirl by four US Marines changed attitudes here dramatically.
It’s a big reason why the US government wants to move Futenma, the largest Marine base in Okinawa, out of the densely populated south of the island to a remote spot 60km away.’
- Japan Agrees to New Military Cooperation Plan with United States Despite Its Pacifist Constitution
- U.S. veterans reveal 1962 nuclear close call dodged in Okinawa
- Okinawa orders halt to work related to US base relocation
- Protests Growing in Okinawa Over U.S. Military Presence
- Okinawa elects leader determined to halt new US Marine air base
- Japan still clearing World War II bombs from Okinawa
- US Military Dictatorship Owns 20% of Okinawa: Interview with Peter Kuznick
- US biological weapons reportedly tested in Japan’s Okinawa in 1960s
- Okinawa: The Pentagon’s Pacific junk heap
- US Empire of Bases: Destruction of Okinawa
‘It was an unexpected act of protest that shook Japan’s carefully managed media world: Shigeaki Koga, a regular television commentator and fierce critic of the political establishment, abruptly departed from the scripted conversation during a live TV news program to announce that this would be his last day on the show because, as he put it, network executives had succumbed to political pressure for his removal.
“I have suffered intense bashing by the prime minister’s office,” Mr. Koga told his visibly flabbergasted host late last month, saying he had been removed as commentator because of critical statements he had made about Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. Later in the program, Mr. Koga held up a sign that read “I am not Abe,” a play on the slogan of solidarity for journalists slain in January at a French satirical newspaper.
The outburst created a public firestorm, and not only because of the spectacle of Mr. Koga, a dour-faced former top government official, seemingly throwing away his career as a television commentator in front of millions of viewers. His angry show of defiance also focused national attention on the right-leaning government’s increased strong-arming of the news media to reduce critical coverage.’
‘US and Japanese officials today unveiled the broad strokes of a new set of “guidelines”for military cooperation, eliminating long-standing geographical restrictions on Japan’s involvement that were and are necessitated by the country’s constitution limiting their military engagements.
Pressed heavily by the US to the biggest military buildup since the end of WW2, and with hawkish Prime Minister Shinzo Abe only too willing to go along, US officials are calling the deal an “historic transition” for Japan.
[…] US interests in confronting China militarily are informing much of this policy, with the planned “Asia pivot” by the Pentagon somewhat blunted by a major new US war against ISIS.
The US has been verbally picking fights with China over naval claims for several years now, backing literally every other country in the region whenever claimed naval territory overlaps, and talking up confrontations in both the South China Sea and the East China Sea.’
- Japan Agrees to New Military Cooperation Plan with United States Despite Its Pacifist Constitution
- U.S., Japan unveil new defense guidelines for global Japanese role
- Kerry renews U.S. pledge to Japan security, including East China Sea islets
- Obama hosts Japan’s Abe, hails alliance as ‘indestructible’
- How History Haunts Shinzo Abe’s Vision for Japan
- Japan PM Abe offers ‘deep repentance’ over war with US
- Japanese prime minister stands by apologies for Japan’s WWII abuses
- Japan’s Top Hawk Calls for the United States to End Hair-Trigger Alert
- Japan jet scrambles ‘near Cold War record’
- Retired Japanese Fighter Pilot Sees an Old Danger on the Horizon
- Poll: Americans divided over Japan’s military role in Asia
- Japanese navy gets biggest flat-top since WWII-era aircraft carriers
‘Japan overtook China in February as the biggest creditor to the U.S., regaining the place it last held at the beginning of the fiscal crisis in 2008. However, it wasn’t a case of Japan buying more than its neighbor, but rather a case of China selling more of its holdings.
[…] The changes reflect the different economic situations the two countries are in. As China’s economic growth slows, it needs fewer dollar assets to prevent the yuan from strengthening. Now China may need to sell dollar assets to keep the yuan from falling as capital outflows increase. In fact, China has been steadily selling U.S. government debt since November 2013, when its holdings peaked at $1.3167 trillion.
Meanwhile, Japan has been increasing its holdings of U.S. treasuries since December 2012 when Shinzo Abe was elected prime minister on a platform to reignite that country’s moribund economy by sparking inflation and weakening the yen. Since then, Japan has bought $113.2 billion of U.S. debt, pushing the yen’s value down 30%.’
‘[…] A total of 279 B-29 Superfortresses took part in the raid, dropping 1,665 tons of bombs on the Japanese capital. The majority were 230kg cluster bombs that each released 38 bomblets carrying napalm at an altitude of around 750 meters.
The weapons were able to burn straight through the flimsy homes, schools and hospitals in what was primarily a residential district.
As well as the 100,000 who were killed, an estimated 125,000 were injured and 1.5 million lost their homes. The raid killed more people than the comparable attack on the German city of Dresden, as well as the immediate casualties of the atomic bomb attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki five months later. The firestorm also destroyed countless small companies churning out equipment for the Japanese war effort.’
‘The brutal beheadings of Japanese nationals Kenji Goto and Haruna Yukawa by the Islamic State in January have shocked the island nation and lent momentum to an effort to expand the limitations imposed on its constitution and military after its defeat by the United States in World War II. Leftists in Japan fear that the incident will encourage a departure from the country’s pacifist constitution, whose Article 9 states that “the Japanese people forever renounce… the threat or use of force as a means of settling international disputes.” Right-wingers, meanwhile, see an opportunity to allow Japan to assert itself as a truly sovereign state. In the wake of the Islamic State beheadings, VICE News reports from Japan, where Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s push to re-militarize the pacifist nation has inspired protests from the left.’ (VICE News)
- Islamic State Killings Pit Japan’s Right Against Left in Battle Over Pacifist Constitution
- Japan Mulls Creating Its Own CIA
- Japan Is Back and So Is Nationalism
- China’s Neighbors Are Going On a Military Shopping Spree — In Japan
- Japan defence ministry makes largest-ever budget request
- Aged Japan veterans voice concerns about military policy shift
- Japan Moves to Scale Back Postwar Restrictions on the Use of Military Power
‘As Japan recovers from the shock of the hostage crisis, lawmakers are beginning to consider how they could have responded to the situation better. One of the key issues being discussed is how to overcome Japan’s reliance on foreign intelligence agencies to gather information abroad, because Japan does not currently have an independent intelligence-gathering entity.
A Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) project team is looking into changing that. The team, chaired by House of Representatives lawmaker Takeshi Iwaya, will look at the possibility of creating an independent intelligence-gathering agency like the United States’ Central Intelligence Agency or the United Kingdom’s Secret Intelligence Service. The team will meet with U.S. and British experts and learn about the British model firsthand over the summer. They are scheduled to draft a proposal by this autumn.’
‘[…] The two-story, 72-room Henn-na Hotel, which is slated to open July 17, will be staffed by ten robots that will greet guests, carry their luggage and clean their rooms. According to The Telegraph, the robots, created by robotics company Kokoro, will be an especially humanoid model known as an “actroid.” Actroid robots are generally based on young Japanese women, and they can speak fluent Japanese, Chinese, Korean and English, as well as mimic body language and human behaviors such as blinking and hand gestures. Three actroids will staff the front desk, dealing with customers as they check in to the hotel. Four will act as porters, carrying guests’ luggage, while another group will focus on cleaning the hotel. The hotel itself will also feature some high-tech amenities, such as facial recognition software that will allow guests to enter locked rooms without a key, and room temperatures monitored by a panel that detects a guest’s body heat.’
‘The U.S. is bolstering its ability to intercept ballistic missiles fired from North Korea with the deployment of another missile-defense radar in central Japan.
In a joint announcement on Friday, the U.S. and Japanese governments said a second so-called Army Navy/Transportable Radar Surveillance system, or AN/TPY-2, made by Raytheon Co. has been installed on the island nation.
The announcement follows discussions last year between President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Shinzo Abe involving deployment of the technology that drew opposition from China.’
‘[…] With their economies moving into the so-called middle-income bracket — higher in the case of fully developed Singapore — governments have more to spend on advanced military platforms and weapons. Southeast Asia’s defense spending grew by 5% on the year to nearly $36 billion in 2013, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, just ahead of the 4.7% increase for East Asia to $282 billion.
Meanwhile, established defense manufacturers in Europe, Russia and North America are eager to sell, with lavish export credits being made available to sweeten deals. Closer to the region, Japan and South Korea, the industrial giants of East Asia, are also entering the arms bazaar.
China’s growing assertiveness in claiming the South China Sea as sovereign territory — against counterclaims from five Southeast Asian countries — has brought encouragement from the U.S., Japan, India and Australia, and help in enhancing the capabilities of regional armed forces and coast guards.
Consequently, the region is seeing large-scale acquisitions of equipment aimed at establishing the ability to contest control and make potential rivals think twice about intruding.’
‘[…] For years nationalism in Japan was relegated to the sidelines. Prevalent before and during the Second World War it found intellectual and political space in the Kokugaku School, the works of Inoue Tetsujirō; before being institutionalized by the state in the form of a corrupted version of Bushido or in Japan’s vision of a “Co-Prosperity Sphere.”
After Japan’s defeat, nationalists faced a much more difficult environment, typified by Japan’s new pacifist constitution. For decades after the war, nationalism was kept alive by a relatively small cadre of political and intellectual elites. Incidents included the 1986 school textbook controversy, 2001 textbook controversy, and the concept of nihonjinron. However, none of these small movements gained any traction in mainstream political and social imagination.
Now, under Shinzo Abe, nationalism is making a disconcerting return to the forefront of Japanese politics. This has manifest in several ways. The first example was the lightning rise of the Japan Restoration Party to become the third-largest party in the Diet in its first election in 2012, displacing the NKP in the process. The party is by perhaps Japan’s leading nationalist, former Tokyo governor Shintaro Ishihara, whose his controversial proposal to buy the Senkaku/Diaoyu islands prompted their nationalization by the Japanese state, a move that sparked a serious downturn in Sino-Japanese relations.’
- China rebukes Japan nationalists over denying Nanjing massacre
- Japanese nationalists attempt to revise history on ‘comfort women’
- ‘New Nationalism’ in Japan
- NHK and Abe’s Agenda
- Tensions in Asia Stoke Rising Nationalism in Japan
- Japan’s State Secrets Bill Polarizes Society
- Is Shinzo Abe’s ‘new nationalism’ a throwback to Japanese imperialism?
- Japanese nationalism
‘Speaking at his country’s first state commemoration of the Nanjing massacre on Saturday, Xi Jinping criticized Japanese nationalists for denying the atrocity.
“Anyone who tries to deny the massacre will not be allowed by history, the souls of the 300,000 deceased victims, 1.3 billion Chinese people and all people loving peace and justice in the world,” Xi said, adding, “Forgetting history is a betrayal, and denying a crime is to repeat a crime.”
He, however, stated that while history must never be forgotten, China should not bear hatred against an entire region “just because a small minority of militarists set off an invasion and war.”’
Incontinence is a common problem among the elderly population and, with the average age of populations across the world increasing, the Japanese market is leading the way
In Japan, people aged 65-and-over account for around a quarter of the overall population, increasing from 17.4% in 2000..’
‘Preliminary work on a controversial new US Marine Corps base on the strategically important Japanese island of Okinawa took a blow Sunday when voters there elected a new governor who is fiercely opposed to the base.
The election was dominated by the US military presence, including the long-planned closure of Futenma, a base and runway situated in the midst of a densely populated city, and the construction of a new Marine air base in a remote and pristine offshore location farther north.
But the election of Takeshi Onaga may cast doubt on the base move, which has been the subject of wrangling for nearly 20 years.
Mr. Onaga would like to move the US base entirely off Okinawa. He is the first candidate for governor to openly oppose the US military base and win an election.’
Editor’s Note: Nomi Prins is a former managing director at Goldman Sachs and a former senior managing director at Bear Stearns. I would HIGHLY recommend reading her new book “All The Presidents’ Bankers“, quite possibly the best work on the history of America’s financial elite that has ever been written. She is also author of “It Takes A Pillage” and a novel “Black Tuesday“. You can check out more of her work at her website, or via the select links below.
‘The recent spike in global political-financial volatility that was temporarily soothed by European Central Bank (ECB) covered bond buying and Bank of Japan (BOJ) stimulus reveals another crack in the six-year-old throw-money-at-the-banks strategies of politicians and central bankers. The premise of using banks as credit portals to transport public funds from the government to citizens is as inefficient as it is not happening. The power elite may exude belabored moans about slow growth and rising inequality in speeches and press releases, but they continue to find ways to provide liquidity, sustenance and comfort to financial institutions, not to populations.
The very fact – that without excessive artificial stimulation or the promise of it – more hell breaks loose – is one that government heads neither admit, nor appear to discuss. But the truth is that the global financial system has already failed. Big banks have been propped up, and their capital bases rejuvenated, by various means of external intervention, not their own business models.
In late October, the Federal Reserve released its latest 2015 stress test scenarios. They don’t even exceed the parameters of what actually took place during the 2008-2009-crisis period. This makes them, though statistically viable, completely irrelevant in an inevitable full-scale meltdown of greater magnitude. This Sunday [Oct 26th], the ECB announced that 25 banks failed their tests, none of which were the biggest banks (that received the most help). These tests are the equivalent of SAT exams for which students provide the questions and answers, and a few get thrown under the bus for cheating to make it all look legit.
Regardless of the outcome of the next set of tests, it’s the very need for them that should be examined. If we had a more controllable, stable, accountable and transparent system (let alone one not in constant litigation and crime-committing mode) neither the pretense of well-thought-out stress tests making a difference in crisis preparation, nor the administering of them, would be necessary as a soothing tool. But we don’t. We have an unreformed (legally and morally) international banking system still laden with risk and losses, whose major players control more assets than ever before, with our help.’
- Nomi Prins: Dodd-Frank Turns Four and Nothing Fundamental has Changed
- Nomi Prins Interviewed on the Keiser Report
- Nomi Prins On The History of the Global Banking Elite
- All the President’s Bankers: Interview with Nomi Prins on Secret History of Washington-Wall Street Collusion
- Nomi Prins: The bankers behind FDR and the Glass-Steagall Act
- Nomi Prins: The Inevitability of Income Inequality
- Gar Alperovitz: Nuclear Attack on Japan was Opposed by American Military Leadership
- If Hiroshima was unnecessary, how to justify Nagasaki?
- Photos: Hiroshima Atomic Bomb Anniversary
- “War Makes Everyone Crazy”: Hiroshima Survivor Reflects on 69th Anniversary of U.S. Atomic Bombing
- Japanese Newsreel Footage on Effects of A-Bomb Seized by U.S. 68 Years Ago
- Chomsky: From Hiroshima to Fukushima, Vietnam to Fallujah, State Power Ignores Its Massive Harm
- U.S. Ramping Up Major Renewal in Nuclear Arms
- John Oliver on America not taking very good care of its 4,800 nuclear weapons
- U.S. Says it Needs Nukes to Defend Against Asteroids
- The five biggest threats to human existence
‘A Japanese governor said Wednesday the country should not restart any nuclear plants until the cause of the Fukushima meltdown is fully understood and nearby communities have emergency plans that can effectively respond to another major accident.
Hirohiko Izumida, governor of central Niigata prefecture — home to the seven-reactor Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant — said regulators look at equipment but don’t evaluate local evacuation plans.
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is pushing to restart two reactors in southern Japan that last month were the first to be approved under stricter safety requirements introduced after the Fukushima disaster. Nuclear Regulation Authority Chairman Shunichi Tanaka has called the new standard one of the world’s highest.
Abe has said he will restart all reactors deemed safe, reversing the previous government’s policy of phasing out nuclear power.’
- Fukushima radiation nearing U.S. West Coast
- Japan’s timid coverage of Fukushima led this news anchor to revolt, says he’s not alone
- Recent Japan Typhoons Impact Fukushima Reactors, Radiation Levels at All Time High
- The Fukushima legacy… 25,000 who cannot go home again
- Fukushima’s Children Aren’t Dying
- The Fukushima Disaster Continues to Worsen
- Thyroid cancer diagnosed in 104 young people in Fukushima
- Fukushima Court Rules Against Nuclear Operator In Suicide Suit
- Two trillion becquerels of radioactive material may have escaped reactor No. 1
- TEPCO coating seafloor at Fukushima port with special cement mixture
- Fukushima’s Giant Ice Wall Can’t Get Cold Enough to Freeze
- TEPCO senior management still out of touch with their victims
- Birth defect deaths in West Coast state hit record levels during 2011, then returned to normal in 2012
- New Scientist Special Report: The fallout from Fukushima
‘It’s no secret that China’s rise as an economic power has been miraculous. Over the past few decades, hundreds of millions of people have been lifted out of poverty, BMWs have replaced many bicycles on the streets of Beijing, and China’s is now the second-largest economy in the world.
This economic explosion has in turn boosted the fortunes of China’s regional neighbors and trading partners — but they’re not entirely happy about China’s newfound power. Because in addition to having the world’s second-largest economy, China is also the second-largest spender on arms in the world — with a military to match.
Neighboring countries feel they’re being pushed around by an aggressive Chinese foreign policy, and as a result, they’re continuing to beed up their own militaries. And it’s Japan, China’s historical rival, that is quietly providing assistance to many countries that — like Japan itself — are feeling the heat from China.’
- Airpower in the Asia-Pacific Region
- China set to pump billions of dollars in India, outwit Japan
- China’s President Xi Jinping wins Maldives backing for ‘maritime silk route’
- Thailand’s ruling junta approves China rail links worth $23bn
- Simmering tensions in East Asia are echoes of Washington’s Cold War intrigues
- India Warships Off Japan Show Rising Lure as China Counterweight
- US and Japan arm satellites against China attack
- Asian worries about China’s rise
- Survey: Asians fear territorial disputes with China will lead to war
- With one eye on Washington, China plots its own Asia ‘pivot’
- Report: China key factor in U.S. military buildup in Guam
- Is the US ready to trigger war in Asia?
- Why China and America are Headed Toward a Catastrophic Clash
- The Militarized Pacific: An Anniversary Without End
- China’s president warns against growing threats to national security
- Obama: We Will Go To War For Other Nations’ Petty Territorial Disputes
- US Vows to Back Allies in Territory Disputes With China
- Obama Aims to Reassure Pacific Allies on ‘Asia Pivot’
- Obama’s Asian Pivot Stumbles
- Yes, Obama’s Asia Trip Is About Containing China
- Growing Muscle: China’s Neighbors Gear Up for a Fight
- Indonesia military worries over Asia arms race, territorial tensions
- Reminder: ‘The US Is Surrounding China With Military Bases, Not Conversely’
- China Hawks Walk the Line on Advocating War
- Hagel: China, Russia challenging US military power
- China Expands its Regional Reach
- The Empire’s New Asian Clothes
- Old game, new obsession, new enemy. Now it’s China.
‘Share trades worth more than the size of Sweden’s economy had to be cancelled in Tokyo after what is believed to be the biggest “fat finger” error on record.
It is thought to be the most extreme example of a trader in financial markets inputting hopelessly wrong figures while working under intense pressure. The identity of the trader is not yet known.
Mistaken orders for shares in 42 major Japanese companies, including household names such as Toyota, Honda, Canon and Sony, totalling ¥67.78trn (£381bn) were overturned, according to data from the Japan Securities Dealers Association.’
‘More than half of Chinese people think their country could go to war with Japan in the future, a new poll revealed Wednesday, after two years of intense diplomatic squabbles.
A survey conducted in both nations found that 53.4 percent of Chinese envisage a future conflict, with more than a fifth of those saying it would happen “within a few years,” while 29 percent of Japanese can see military confrontation.
The findings come ahead of the second anniversary Thursday of Japan’s nationalization of disputed islands in the East China Sea that have formed the focus of tensions between the Asian giants.’
- Japan Takes Large Southern Extension of Continental Shelf
- With eye on China, Japan slowly building amphibious force with help of US Marines
- With eye on China, South Korea, Japan ruling party eyes Bill to put troops on remote islands
- Japan names 5 disputed islets in East China Sea
- Sino-Japanese War still stings China 120 years later
- Chinese Think-Tank: Japan’s military buildup cause for worry
- Japan and China Compete for Latin American Clout
- China says Japan should respect concerns on military
- Japan blasts Chinese bid for U.N. recognition of Nanjing massacre
- China says Philippines stirring tensions after Aquino supports Japan
- China uses D-Day rites to blast Japan’s stance on war history
- Japan and the South China Sea Conflict
- Defense Academy Dorms Crowded as Japan Faces China Tension
- Pepe Escobar: Obama makes South China waves
- How China Is Eclipsing Japan in Asia
- Top U.S. Marine in Japan: If tasked, we could retake the Senkakus from China
‘China says its land reclamation work in the South China Sea is “totally justifiable” as it has “sovereignty” over the area. Its foreign affairs ministry spokesman Hua Chunying was responding to a BBC report which documented China’s construction work in disputed waters. The Philippines has accused China of illegal building in the area.
China is locked in a dispute with several countries over maritime claims in the South China Sea. The BBC report by Rupert Wingfield-Hayes said China was building new islands on five different reefs. He and his team documented Chinese work to dredge tonnes of rock and sand from the sea floor to pump into Johnson South reef in the Spratly islands, which are also claimed by Manila.’
- China’s Island Factory
- Philippines displays ancient maps to debunk China’s sea claims
- Singapore and the Sea of Discontent
- Remote, gas-rich islands on Indonesia’s South China Sea frontline
- Philippines Renews Arbitration Push in South China Seas Dispute
- U.S. to monitor South China Sea for de-escalation after China rebuff
- U.S. to press South China Sea freeze despite China rejection
- Manila urges unity for South East Asian nations in China sea dispute
- New Chinese map gives greater play to South China Sea claims
- China to build school in contested Paracel Islands
- China Building Dubai-Style Fake Islands in South China Sea
- China says Vietnam, Philippines’ mingling on disputed isle a ‘farce’
- China says Philippines stirring tensions after Aquino supports Japan
- Japan and the South China Sea Conflict
- 103 words that tie the U.S. military to barren rocks in the East China Sea
- China blames U.S. for stoking tensions in South China Sea
- Pepe Escobar: Obama makes South China waves
‘The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) – the corporate lobbyist in Washington, D.C. for the disintegrating atomic power industry – doesn’t have to worry about repercussions from the negative impacts of nuclear power. For nuclear power is a government/taxpayer-guaranteed boondoggle whose staggering costs, incurred and deferred, are absorbed by American taxpayers via a supine government regulatory and subsidy apparatus.’
‘Japan’s defence ministry has made its biggest ever budget request, amid severe tensions with China over a maritime dispute in the East China Sea. The ministry is seeking 5.05 trillion yen (£29.4bn; $48.7bn) for the year – a 3.5% rise. If approved, it would mark the third year the defence budget had been increased, after a decade of cuts.
Earlier this month, the ministry described the security environment around Japan as “increasingly severe”. Beijing and Tokyo are engaged in a bitter dispute over islands known as Senkaku in Japan and Diaoyu in China. In its annual white paper, the ministry spoke of “great concern” over China’s activities in the East China Sea and also cited North Korea as a security threat.’
‘A range of scientific studies at Fukushima have begun to reveal the impact on the natural world from the radiation leaks at the power station in Japan caused by an earthquake and tsunami in 2011. Biological samples were obtained only after extensive delays following the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear power plant meltdown, limiting the information which could be gained about the impact of that disaster. Scientists, determined not to repeat the shortcomings of the Chernobyl studies, began gathering biological information only a few months after the meltdown of the Daiichi power plant in 2011.
Results of these studies are now beginning to reveal serious biological effects of the Fukushima radiation on non-human organisms ranging from plants to butterflies to birds. A series of articles summarising these studies has now been published in the Journal of Heredity. These describe widespread impacts, ranging from population declines to genetic damage to responses by the repair mechanisms that help organisms cope with radiation exposure. “A growing body of empirical results from studies of birds, monkeys, butterflies, and other insects suggests that some species have been significantly impacted by the radioactive releases related to the Fukushima disaster,” says Dr Timothy Mousseau of the University of South Carolina, lead author of one of the studies.’
- The Fukushima Health Crisis: Why New Studies Are Needed Now!
- Study: Japanese monkeys’ abnormal blood linked to Fukushima disaster
- Abnormal changes in small birds and the role of science
- Harvey Wasserman: Fukushima’s Children are Dying
- Global Physicians Issue Scathing Critique of UN Report on Fukushima
- UN Report: Fukushima radiation ‘unlikely’ to increase cancer rates
- Trace Levels of Fukushima Disaster Radionuclides in East Pacific Albacore
- Navy sailor suffering after Fukushima exposure: Others with same symptoms “told to be quiet”
- Ailing U.S. Sailors Sue TEPCO After Exposure to Radiation 30x Higher Than Normal
- U.S. sailors sue Tepco for $1 billion over alleged radiation exposure
- Radiation damage at the root of Chernobyl’s ecosystems
- Japan Nuclear Prof.: Fukushima plant now a ‘swamp of radioactive material’
- Japan Correspondent: It’s very scary, officials trying to brainwash public about Fukushima crisis
- TEPCO faces hurdles in construction of ice walls to block flow of contaminated water
- Will the Ice Wall Contain Fukushima’s Radiation? Interview with Paul Gunter
- No End in Sight for Nuclear Meltdown: Interview with Paul Gunter
- Manager at Japan’s Fukushima plant admits radioactive water ’embarrassing’
- Japan’s Government Says It Must Restart Nuclear Reactors To Fuel The Country
- Fukushima, General Electric and the Obama Administration
- Unskilled and Destitute Are Hiring Targets for Fukushima Cleanup
- Concerns Over Measurement of Fukushima Fallout
‘Photos of Mao’s archenemy Chiang Kai-shek adorn the walls of a Beijing restaurant, and his face looks up at diners from the menu. Online, the deposed Chinese leader’s image is used to sell the kinds of lamps and swords he might have used. A liquor brand has patterned its bottle on Chiang’s memorial in Taipei. Twenty years ago, Chiang was considered an enemy of the people on mainland China. Today, he has become part of mainstream culture — sort of.
There has been a grudging acceptance of Chiang’s historical role in fighting against Japan following its invasion in the lead-up to World War II. Chiang later lost to Mao Zedong’s Communists in the Chinese civil war and fled in 1949 to Taiwan, where he ruled until his death in 1975. His revival on the mainland points to how China’s Communist Party uses history to make points about present-day politics. Chiang is doubly useful in that sense because China’s relations with Taiwan have been warming, while those with Japan are in steep decline.’
‘Tokuro Inokuma, a former Imperial Japanese Army soldier, got his first taste of the horrors of war in 1945 when he scrambled to gather up the scattered limbs of his fellow servicemen, blown apart by a U.S. air raid in Japan. He was 16. One of a dwindling number of World War Two veterans, Inokuma now finds troubling echoes in Tokyo’s policy shift away from the pacifist ideals adhered to after 1945. “I find it quite dangerous … This is the path we once took,” said Inokuma, who fought in China soon after the deadly air strike, and survived two years in concentration camps in the then-Soviet Union following Japan’s surrender.
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe last month took a historic step by ending a ban that has kept the military from fighting abroad since 1945. The move has riled China, whose ties with Japan have been frayed by a territorial row over East China Sea islets. “We have neither killed nor been killed (in battle) for almost 70 years. That’s unprecedented. It’s important we think hard about that,” Inokuma, 85, told Reuters in an interview. Proponents say Japan needs to be able to exercise its right of collective self-defense, or helping a friendly country under attack, to respond to a tougher security environment. Critics say the change makes Japan more likely to get sucked into overseas wars.’
- Japan Is Readying Stealth Technology for Future Aircraft
- How Japan Fell in Love With America’s Drones
- Japan eyes buying Ospreys as US looks to expand fleet to mainland
- Veteran politician Ozawa: Japan PM’s policy shift risks dangerous path
- AKB48 singer recruits for SDF as Abe boosts military
- Tokyo sued over growth of military power
- Japan Ditches Pacifist Constitution Clause, Legalizes Overseas Intervention
- Eric Margolis: War of the Rising Sun
- Japan’s Constitutional Revisionism – Bowing Low to Washington
- Thousands denounce Japanese PM Abe’s security shift
- Japanese man self-immolates in pro-pacifist constitution protest
- Japan Military Jets Scrambled Record 340 Times in April-June
‘If shame is the natural response to Hiroshima, how is one to respond to Nagasaki, especially in view of all the declassified government papers on the subject? According to Dr. Joseph Gerson’s With Hiroshima Eyes, some 74,000 were killed instantly at Nagasaki, another 75,000 were injured and 120,000 were poisoned.
If Hiroshima was unnecessary, how to justify Nagasaki?
The saving of thousands of US lives is held up as the official justification for the two atomic bombings. Leaving aside the ethical and legal question of slaughtering civilians to protect soldiers, what can be made of the Nagasaki bomb if Hiroshima’s incineration was not necessary?’