‘[…] A global ban on cluster munitions was signed in 2008, though neither the United States nor Saudi Arabia was a signatory to the ban. The US continues to export the bombs, which leave unexploded bomblets across a area, often for years, but the Pentagon insists they only sell to countries that promise not to use them on civilians.
Yet America’s own recent history with cluster bombs is checkered, at best, having littered civilian populated areas in Iraq and Afghanistan with such bombs, leaving the brightly colored bomblets to be found by children. The US has similarly shipped the bombs to both Israel and Saudi Arabia, nations which have been racking up major civilian death tolls in recent wars.’
‘[…] It amazes me that all these warriors of the air don’t regularly crash into each other as they go on bombing and bombing. And since Lebanon’s Middle East Airlines is the only international carrier still flying over Syria – but not, thank heavens, over Isis’s Syrian capital of Raqqa – I’m even more amazed that my flights from Beirut to the Gulf have gone untouched by the blitz boys of so many Arab and Western states as they career around the skies of Mesopotamia and the Levant.
The sectarian and theological nature of this war seems perfectly clear to all who live in the Middle East – albeit not to our American chums. The Sunni Saudis are bombing the Shia Yemenis and the Shia Iranians are bombing the Sunni Iraqis. The Sunni Egyptians are bombing Sunni Libyans, it’s true, and the Jordanian Sunnis are bombing Iraqi Sunnis. But the Shia-supported Syrian government forces are bombing their Sunni Syrian enemies and the Lebanese Hezbollah – Shia to a man – are fighting the Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s Sunni enemies, along with Iranian Revolutionary Guards and an ever-larger number of Afghan Shia men in Syrian uniforms.’
- By asking for ‘Sunni soldiers’ Saudi Arabia is trying to divide Pakistan Army
- Saudi Arabia’s airstrikes in Yemen are fuelling the Gulf’s fire
- Middle East political rivalries stoke dangerous sectarianism
- The Pentagon plan to ‘divide and rule’ the Muslim world
- If this is what an anti-war presidency looks like to you, you’re detached from reality
- How the west created the Islamic State… with a little help from our friends
- Sectarian Jihad in Syria: Made in the USA?
- The Redirection
‘The co-founder of the group behind the contest to award $10,000 for the best cartoon depiction of Muhammad is a New Yorker who runs a blog that campaigns to stop the “Islamification” of America.
Pamela Geller used her blog Atlas Shrugs to declare “this is war” in the hours after the shooting of two gunmen at the contest. The event had been organised by the American Freedom Defense Initiative, a group she set up with Robert Spencer in 2010.
Geller, the winner of numerous awards from far-right organisations such as the David Horowitz Freedom Center, is credited with coining the term “ground zero mega mosque” as part of highly publicised campaign against the development of a community centre, which included a mosque, a few blocks from where the twin towers once stood in New York.
She became politically active after 11 September and has told various newspapers she had never heard of Osama Bin Laden until the day of the attacks but started educating herself as a housewife living in Long Island raising four children. She eventually started a blog, Atlas Shrugs.’
- Police kill 2 men who opened fire outside Muhammad art show in Garland
- Gunmen killed outside US exhibition on Islam’s prophet
- Muslims Defend Pam Geller’s Right to Hate
- The woman behind anti-Islamic Muhammad cartoon contest and her long history of hatred
- Extreme ‘free speech’ group refused to cancel provocative ‘Muhammad Art Exhibit’ despite protests
- ISIs Claims Responsibility for Texas Shooting – Reports
- Pamela Geller – Profile
- Geert Wilders – Profile
‘A new scathing report by the Nobel prize-winning Physicians for Social Responsibility has revealed that more than 1.3 million people were killed only during the first ten years of the Global War on Terror (GWOT) in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan alone. What was formerly known as GWOT — or, in Dubya-speak, “war on terra” — was Orwellianized by the Obama administration into “Overseas Contingency Operations” (OCO).
Crucially, the report does not even cover OCO’s trail in Libya, Syria, Somalia and Yemen (one war “won” by NATO/AFRICOM; one ongoing civil war; and two targets of Obama’s nefarious “kill list”.) Moreover, the figures on AfPak and Iraq are far from being the latest. And the total estimate of lethal casualties is considered “conservative”.
The record shows that this OCO killing machine ran amok for almost 15 years against whole swathes of the planet — not to mention burning trillions of dollars in U.S. taxpayer funds — and had absolutely zero effect in containing terrorism. Rather the contrary; Asia Times readers are aware of how I’ve defined GWOT as the gift that keeps on giving.
And it all started way before 9/11 — and the official Dubya enshrinement of GWOT.’
- NY Times Editorial: Stumbling Into a Wider War
- Is the Whole “War on Terror” a Fraud? Interview with Michael Springmann
- Tomorrow’s Battlefield: U.S. Proxy Wars and Secret Ops in Africa
- Unworthy victims: Western wars have killed four million Muslims since 1990
- The Pentagon plan to ‘divide and rule’ the Muslim world
- The Endless $1.6 Trillion War on Terror
- The rise of ISIS in Iraq is a neocon’s dream
- How the west created the Islamic State… with a little help from our friends
- ‘war on terror’ – by design – can never end
- Unfolding the Future of the Long War: Motivations, Prospects, and Implications for the U.S. Army
- Playing skittles with Saddam: Gameplan to reshape the Middle East along US-Israeli lines
‘It should come as no surprise that the United States and its coalition partners are discussing widening the war against the Islamic State beyond the borders of Iraq and Syria. Wider wars have become almost habitual in recent years, as military conflicts have expanded with little public awareness or debate. President George W. Bush’s ‘war on terror’ began in Afghanistan, then moved to Iraq and elsewhere. Fourteen years after the Sept. 11 attacks, President Obama is still deploying American troops and weapons to fight Al Qaeda and other extremists in far-flung parts of the world, including Pakistan.
The fight against the Islamic State has focused largely on Iraq and Syria, where the group, also known as ISIS or ISIL, has seized large swaths of land and established a firm presence. But some regional members of the anti-ISIS coalition of more than 60 nations, according to a report in The Times, are now pressing the administration to carry the fight to other terrorist groups that have declared themselves ‘provinces’ of the Islamic State.
In theory, that could involve the United States and the coalition in Libya, where ISIS has sent a small number of fighters to help organize militants. It could also mean moving against Ansar Beit al-Maqdis, an ISIS-supported terrorist group in the Sinai Peninsula that greatly worries Egypt. Intelligence officials estimate that ISIS may have as many as 31,500 fighters in Syria and Iraq; at least a couple of hundred other extremists in Jordan, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia and other countries have also made less formal pledges of support for ISIS.
It is essential that further expansion of the campaign against ISIS and other militant groups be debated rigorously and openly by Washington and its coalition partners. For one thing, it is dangerous and unwise to assume that ‘affiliates’ pledging support for ISIS are controlled by ISIS, share its resources or can duplicate its ruthless skills. Many cannot do so, and the coalition would make a serious mistake if it treated all splinter groups as the same kind of threat.
In any case, the problem is far more complicated than just going after ISIS and its affiliates. There are many threats ravaging and destabilizing the Middle East, North Africa and Central Asia, including not only extremistists (some allied with ISIS, many not) but also stubborn, long-standing sectarian conflicts and, in some failed states like Yemen and Libya, the near-total collapse of governmental authority and civil order. That makes finding a coherent and effective strategy — or more likely strategies — to deal with these challenges much harder.’
‘The number of people using food banks will double to more than two million a year under the Conservatives’ plans for £12bn of welfare cuts, an academic study by Oxford University suggests.
The research was seized on by Labour as evidence that David Cameron’s welfare cuts will have far-reaching consequences for family budgets, including eating into in-work benefits, if the Conservatives get back into power next week. On the Question Time leaders’ debate on Thursday, Mr Cameron said he did not want or had no plans to cut child benefit further – but Labour claims this does not mean he has ruled it out. The Prime Minister, asked about child benefit cuts on BBC Breakfast yesterday, again refused to rule it out.
Labour’s spokesperson on work and pensions, Rachel Reeves, told The Independent on Sunday that the Oxford University study was extremely worrying for families on low incomes, and claimed that Mr Cameron’s failure to rule out child benefit cuts suggested that they were on the table.
Last month, the Trussell Trust, the charity that provides parcels to food banks, revealed that visits had risen to over one million a year for the first time.’
- The austerity delusion
- The Tory economic plan is NOT working, at all – sadly, their PR war is
- David Cameron: I have no plans to cut child benefit
- ‘Secret’ Tory plans for £8bn in welfare cuts exposed by Danny Alexander
- Lib Dems will have to accept Tory welfare cuts for deficit reduction deal – study
- Sunday Times rich list: Number of billionaires in Britain doubles in five years
- Food bank use tops million mark over the past year
- Food banks: ‘Most people at the school gates have used them’
- Tories may not reveal details of £12bn welfare cuts until after election
‘They brought us war against Iraq – what do the hawks in Washington have in store for us now? Panorama investigates the “neo-conservatives”, the small and unelected group of right-wingers, who critics claim have hijacked the White House. Throughout the war with Iraq, Steve Bradshaw was with the neocons in Washington – discovering whether they’re really trying to run the world the American way.’ (BBC Panorama)
- 61 Times Bill Kristol Was Reminded of Hitler and Churchill
- The Kagans: A Family Business of Perpetual War
- The rise of ISIS in Iraq is a neocon’s dream
- Are Neocons Getting Ready to Ally With Hillary Clinton?
- Neoconservative Resurgence in the Age of Obama
- Project for the New American Century
- Foreign Policy Initiative
- American Enterprise Institute
- A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm
- Weekly Standard
- Richard Perle
- Michael Ledeen
- William Kristol
- Robert Kagan
- David Wurmser
- Meyrav Wurmser
- James Woolsey
- Douglas Feith
- Eliot Cohen
- Joshua Muravchik
- Dick Cheney
- Donald Rumsfeld
- Paul Wolfowitz
- John Bolton
- Elliott Abrams
- Condoleezza Rice
‘Weekly Standard editor William Kristol, writing in opposition to the Iran deal recently, observed, “One is reminded — as one so often is these days — of Churchill’s great speech in Commons after Munich … ” It is true that Kristol is often reminded of Churchill and Munich these days. This may not tell us anything about the current situation with Iran, however, since Kristol is reminded of Churchill and Munich on a great many days. It is a historic reference he has used to explain a great many episodes.
I recently asked New York interns Claire Landsbaum and Claire Voon to compile a list of Kristol’s public references to the Munich agreement and its main players. This research ordeal, presented in reverse chronological order, represents the sort of character-building exercise, I am sure Kristol would agree, that today’s youth badly need.’
‘Judith Miller’s publicity campaign for her new book (The Story: A Reporter’s Journey) which has taken her from the Wall Street Journal to numerous television interviews, has been an instructive and engaging media spectacle.
She has shown characteristic passion and energy in attempting to defend her journalistic reputation after being pummeled during her final years at The New York Times for, among other things, writing persuasively that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction.
But it is discouraging that the truth can be challenged by a determined and wily opponent with a platform to propound discredited ideas. And Miller has long been given such a platform, first by The Times and now by a prominent book publisher.
In my 24 years at The Times I frequently worked with Miller, often unhappily, as I will explain. Her efforts at recasting events have thus not been a surprise to me.’
- Jon Stewart tears into Judith Miller over Iraq reporting
- The Real Problem with Judith Miller
- Maher Confronts Judith Miller: Why Weren’t You More Skeptical About Iraq?
- Judith Miller tries, and ultimately fails, to defend her flawed Iraq reporting
- Judith Miller: ‘No senior official spoon-fed me a line about WMD’
- Now They Tell Us (2004)
- The Times scoop that melted (2003)
‘A Colombian former intelligence chief was jailed for 14 years on Thursday for spying on judges, journalists and opposition figures in a high-profile case that stained the legacy of popular ex-president Alvaro Uribe.
The Supreme Court convicted Maria del Pilar Hurtado in February of ordering illegal wiretaps on a former senator, two opposition politicians, the mayor of Bogota and its own judges during Uribe’s presidency from 2002 to 2010.
The sentence was less than the 20 years requested by prosecutors.’
‘Every year around Italy’s April 25 liberation day festivities, a group of unapologetic Italians hold a commemoration of their own—they mark the death of Benito Mussolini, who was killed on April 28, 1945, in Giulina di Mezzegra in northern Italy. But it is not to celebrate the event. In what is becoming a trend in Mussolini nostalgia, a growing number of Italians are finding the bright side of a very dark chapter in Italian history.
Commemorating Mussolini is not entirely new in Italy. For years, hundreds of skinheads and self-proclaimed fascists have made pilgrimages to Mussolini’s hometown of Predappio three times a year (at his birth, his death and the October anniversary of his 1922 march on Rome). They visit his old stomping grounds. They flock at the villa where he was born and lay flowers at the mausoleum where he was buried.’
- Mussolini’s Fascism
- The Italians who worship Mussolini
- The Untold Story of Mussolini’s Fake Diaries
- Mussolini’s Latina Remains a Living Monument of Fascist Nostalgia
- Did the Brutal Death of Mussolini Contribute to Hitler’s Suicide?
- ‘Pope And Mussolini’ Tells The ‘Secret History’ Of Fascism And The Church
- Benito Mussolini: What is Fascism
- Mussolini: The Untold Story
- Benito Mussolini – Wikipedia
‘Austrian Foreign Minister Sebastian Kurz was speaking at the five-year review conference of the 1970 nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
Diplomats from the 159 countries supporting the ban, presented ahead of the 70th anniversary of the U.S. atom bombs dropped on Japan, said the initiative was modelled on successful campaigns to ban land mines and other weapons and could take years to move forward.
The initiative has virtually no support among NPT nuclear weapons states and veto-wielding Security Council members – the United States, Britain, France, Russia and China – or the countries of NATO, an alliance that provides a kind of “nuclear umbrella” security guarantee for its members.
But most of the 193 U.N. members back it.’
Editor’s Note: As the review states, Dr. Pillsbury is a senior fellow and director for Chinese strategy at the Hudson Institute. You can learn more about this right-wing think-tank here.
‘Let me begin by noting that this is a highly engaging and thought-provoking read. It does what few books do well, and that is to mix scholarship, policy, and memoir-style writing in an accessible but still intellectually rich fashion. Pillsbury, senior fellow and director for Chinese strategy at the Hudson Institute, presents a straightforward thesis. In its most bald form, he argues that China has a long-term marathon strategy to supplant the United States as the sole superpower by 2049. If successful, Pillsbury argues that China will reshape the world into one that will “nurture autocracies,” “rewrit[e] history to defam[e] the West and prais[e] China,” sell its own highly polluting development model to other countries, and constrain the political space for international organizations (195).
If that were all there were to this book, it would be easy to dismiss. Pillsbury, however, manages to draw on his extensive knowledge of Chinese historical military writings and theory as well as his interactions with Chinese defectors and senior military officers to develop a compelling analytical defense of this thesis. He describes his theory elegantly in Chinese terms, using a Chinese concept of shi (an alignment of forces or creation of an opportunity). For Pillsbury, in shi and the Chinese game weiqi, one can discern the basic Chinese strategy of “deceiving an opponent into complacency, whereby he expends his energy in a way that helps you even as you move to encircle him” (42-45). This theme of Chinese deception and U.S. naivete underpin much of Pillsbury’s analysis. He argues that through an elaborate plan of deception in which China underplays its strengths, Beijing has managed to dupe the West into helping China develop its economy and advance its scientific capabilities, therein planting the seeds of the United States’ own destruction.’
‘Whatever happens with the nuclear negotiations this summer, and as much as Tehran wants cooperation and not confrontation, Iran is bound to remain — alongside Russia — a key US geostrategic target.
As much as US President Barack Obama tried to dismiss it, the Russian sale of the S-300 missile system to Iran is a monumental game-changer. Even with the added gambit of the Iranian military assuring the made in Iran Bavar 373 may be even more efficient than the S-300.
This explains why Jane’s Defense Weekly was already saying years ago that Israel could not penetrate Iranian airspace even if it managed to get there. And after the S-300s Iran inevitably will be offered the even more sophisticated S-400s, which are to be delivered to China as well.
The unspoken secret behind these game-changing proceedings actually terrifies Washington warmongers; it spells out a further frontline of Eurasian integration, in the form of an evolving Eurasian missile shield deployed against Pentagon/NATO ballistic plans.
A precious glimpse of what’s ahead was offered at the Moscow Conference on International Security (MICS) in mid-April.’
- How the Russia-China Strategic Partnership Marks a New Global Power Shift
- Beijing calls for new ‘Silk Road’ between China and Europe
- Is China Going to Be the World’s Superpower Within a Few Short Decades?
- Putin, Xi Jinping sign mega gas deal on second gas supply route
- US-backed TPP to be ineffective without Russia, China, says Putin
- How the west created the Islamic State…. with a little help from our friends
- China’s ‘New Silk Road’ Vision Revealed
- Can China and Russia Squeeze Washington Out of Eurasia?
- The Birth of a Eurasian Century: Russia and China Do Pipelineistan
- Liquid War: Welcome to Pipelineistan
- RAND Report: Unfolding the Future of the Long War
‘[…] Questions abound as to how this impoverished nation, ranked 145 out of 187 on the United Nations Human Development Index (HDI) – making it one of the world’s Least Developed Countries (LDCs) – will recover from the disaster, considered the worst in Nepal in over 80 years.
One possible solution has come from the Jubilee USA Network, an alliance of over 75 U.S.-based organisations and 400 faith communities worldwide, which said in a press release Monday that Nepal could qualify for debt relief under the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) new Catastrophe Containment and Relief Trust (CCR).
The IMF created the CCR this past February in order to assist poor countries recover from severe natural disasters or health crises by providing grants for debt service relief. Already, the fund has eased some of the financial woes of Ebola-impacted countries by agreeing to cancel nearly 100 million dollars of debt.
Quoting World Bank figures, Jubilee USA said in a statement, “Nepal owes 3.8 billion dollars in debt to foreign lenders and spent 217 million dollars repaying debt in 2013.”
Nepal owes some 1.5 billion dollars each to the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank, as well as 54 million dollars to the IMF, 133 million dollars to Japan and 101 million dollars to China.’
- Death Toll In Nepal Crosses 6800
- Nepal quake: ‘No chance’ to find more survivors, as death toll rises
- Nepal government criticised for blocking earthquake aid to remote areas
- Nepal customs holding up relief efforts, says United Nations
- Aid Needed For Earthquake Victims On Himalayan Villages
- Nepal’s Rich Cultural Heritage Devastated By Quake
- Nepal Aid Workers Helped by Drones, Crowdsourcing
- One thousand Europeans still missing after Nepal quake
- Nepali village deals with death and destruction
- The economic impact of Nepal’s earthquake
- Disease outbreak threatens Nepal’s quake survivors
‘Of 10 major societal institutions, just two — the military and scientists — garnered majority support from millennials on the question of whom they trust to do the right thing most of the time. That’s according to new polling by Harvard University’s Institute of Politics of this most-written-and-talked-about generation, which encompasses those ranging in age from 18 to 29.
The lack of trust in longtime pillars of society among millennials is striking both for its depth and its breadth. No one is spared their side-eyed looks.
The media gets its worst — with 88 percent of millennials saying they only “sometimes” or “never” trust the press. Wall Street doesn’t fare much better, with 86 percent of millennials expressing distrust. Congress is at 82 percent. Three in four millennials (74 percent) sometimes or never trust the federal government to do the right thing, and two in three (63 percent) feel the same way about the president. The Supreme Court, once a beacon of trust societywide, isn’t seen that way by millennials, with 58 percent saying they only sometimes or never trust the nation’s highest court to do the right thing. Heck, even local police aren’t spared; 50 percent say they trust the cops only sometimes or never to do the right thing, while 49 percent said they trust police “all” or “most” of the time.”
‘U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon warned Thursday that Saudi Arabian air strikes and combat between Yemen’s warring sides that target civilian and United Nations facilities are having a devastating impact on humanitarian aid efforts and are in violation of the laws of war.
In a statement, Ban said the attacks included bombardment of hospitals, humanitarian warehouses and U.N. compounds, and that civilians in Aden, Yemen’s second largest city, had been targeted by snipers. He called the attacks “unacceptable and in violation of international humanitarian law.”
U.N. officials have cited both the air campaign and fighting between Houthi rebels and supporters of the government of exiled Yemeni President Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi in statements denouncing the growing civilian toll. But they’ve been particularly critical of the Saudi air strikes, which they say have all but halted any effort to evacuate civilians by air or deliver humanitarian aid. The United States is providing aerial refueling and intelligence to the Saudi-led campaign.
On Thursday, Ban said more than 1,200 people have been killed in the past six weeks of fighting and that 300,000 have fled their homes.’
- Yemenis in Desperate Need of Food and Fuel After Weeks of Airstrikes
- Saudis Bomb Yemen Airport, Assuring End to Aid Flights
- ISIS Issues Video Showing Execution of 15 Soldiers in Yemen
- Dozens Killed as Houthis, Saudi Forces Fight Along Yemen Border
- Pakistan wants peaceful solution of Yemen, says PM
- Video Claims the Islamic State Has Established a New Branch in Yemen
- Over 550 Civilians Killed So Far in Saudi War on Yemen
- 115 Children Killed: Saudi Arabia’s War on Yemen by the Numbers
- Saudi bombing in Yemen still claiming civilian casualties, UN says
- Saudis Increase Airstrikes Against Yemen, Strikes Reported Nationwide
- Fighting Prompts an Exodus From Yemen, Often on Boats
- The Saudi prince who offered Bentleys to bombers
- Saudi Arabia to deploy ground troops in Yemen
- US Naval Deployment to Yemen Targets Iran
- Why Is the U.S. Backing a War That’s Helping al-Qaida?
- Under Bombardment in Yemen, Civilians Voice Terror and Despair Online
- No power, no fuel, no water, no food. That’s Yemen right now
- US Increases Involvement in Saudi War Against Yemen
‘The controversial leader of an Iranian dissidents group was called to Capitol Hill to lend her expertise about the Islamic State lawmakers. Her testimony Wednesday showed she was only interested in talking about Iran.
Maryam Rajavi, leader of the Iranian dissidents organization Mujahedeen-e-Khalq (MEK), a group that until 2012 was list on the State Department’s terror list, insisted Tehran was the root of the Islamic State’s power. In prepared testimony, she mentioned Iran 135 times. By comparison, the Islamic State, or ISIS, got 19 mentions; Iraq was mentioned 48 times. Nuclear, as in Iran’s nuclear program, got 31 mentions.
But lawmakers tolerated Rajavi’s notion that “terrorism and fundamentalism came from the mullahs’ regime in Iran. When that is overthrown [the Islamic State] will be destroyed.”’
‘Syria’s Foreign Ministry was quoted on the nation’s state media today as blaming Turkey in large measure for al-Qaeda’s takeover of the border town of Jisr al-Shughour, saying Turkish military forces providing both logistics support and providing “support fire” for advancing Islamists.
This is not the first time Syria has blamed Turkey for al-Qaeda’s recent gains, as they similarly accused Turkey of having orchestrated the offensive which put them in control of the city of Idlib, not far away.’
- Syria accuses Turkey of ‘direct aggression’ alongside militants
- CIA-Backed Rebels Fight Alongside al-Qaeda Wing in Syria
- How Turkey’s Islamist gov’t helped al-Qaeda and ISIS
- Turkish military says MIT shipped weapons to al-Qaeda
- Ankara refutes UN report claiming Turkey route for arms to al-Qaeda
- Turkish government co-operated with al-Qaeda in Syria, says former US ambassador
- Syrian rebels hail fall of Jisr al-Shughour as sign of growing strength
‘The unusual announcement by President Barack Obama last week that a U.S. strike on an al Qaida compound in Pakistan inadvertently had killed two hostages – one a U.S. citizen, the other Italian – came with an apology and the speedy pledge of monetary compensation for the families.
None of that happened for another American who was killed in a U.S. strike in 2011. Abdulrahman al Awlaki, the 16-year-old son of al Qaida propagandist Anwar al Awlaki, wasn’t believed to have been involved in militant activities and, by the U.S. government’s own version, was an unintended casualty of the U.S. attack that killed him in Yemen.
Yet four years on, despite a media campaign and a lawsuit, the Obama administration has not apologized for the killing or offered compensation to the Awlaki family. Human rights advocates say the reason is that, when it comes to making amends for civilian deaths in U.S. counterterrorism operations, not all lives are valued the same – even when they’re American.’
‘At least 4,811 people were killed in Iraq during April, and 1,358 were wounded. Of those 168 were killed in the last day or so. Meanwhile, the U.S. and Iraq are at odds over the arming of Sunnis and Kurds. All this comes as the European Union publicly acknowledges that the situation in Iraq is just getting worse.
According to the figures compiled on Antiwar.com during April, 1,631 civilians and security personnel were killed in Iraq during the month. The number of wounded civilians and security personnel reached 1,077 in the news reports used to compile these figures. At least 3,180 militants were reported killed as well, and another 281 militants were injured. The totals are 4,811 were killed and 1,358 were wounded. These should be considered low estimates.’
‘[…] The US left Vietnam in a state of physical ruin. Roads, rail lines, bridges and canals were devastated by bombing. Unexploded shells and landmines littered the countryside, often underwater in the paddy fields where peasants waded. Five million hectares of forest had been stripped of life by high explosives and Agent Orange. The new government reckoned that two-thirds of the villages in the south had been destroyed. In Saigon, the American legacy included packs of orphans roaming the streets and a heroin epidemic. Nationally, the new government estimated it was dealing with 10 million refugees; 1 million war widows; 880,000 orphans; 362,000 war invalids; and 3 million unemployed people.
The economy was in chaos. By the time Liberation Day arrived, inflation was running at up to 900%, and Vietnam – a country full of paddy fields – was having to import rice. In peace talks in Paris, the US had agreed to pay $3.5bn in reconstruction aid to mend the shattered infrastructure. It never paid a cent. Adding insult to penury, the US went on to demand that the communist government repay millions of dollars borrowed by its enemy, the old Saigon regime. Vietnam desperately needed the world to provide the trade and aid that could turnits economy around. The US did its best to make sure it got neither.’
- Lessons From the Vietnam War: Interview with Marge Tabankin
- Lessons of the Vietnam War: We Haven’t Learned Them
- The “Obvious” Lessons of the Vietnam War
- Vietnam War by Associated Press photographers
- Agent Orange and its Vietnamese legacy
- The Fall of Saigon: Does Europe Remember What Happened 40 Years Ago?
- The Forgotten Power of the Vietnam Protest, 1965-1975
- ‘Saigon has fallen’ _ a reporter’s view of Vietnam War’s end
- Vietnam War 40 years on: Ex-Marines recall being on the final choppers out of Saigon
- I was one of the last Americans to leave Saigon: Dick Hughes’ Vietnam oral history
- Nixon and the My Lai massacre coverup
‘Yemen is short of many things, but weapons is not one of them. Yemenis own between 40 and 60 million guns, according to a report by UN experts published earlier this year. This should be enough for Yemen’s 26 million people, although the experts note that demand for grenades that used to cost $5, handguns ($150) and AK-47s ($150) has increased eightfold. Whatever else happens, the war in Yemen is not going to end because any of the participants are short of weaponry.
Yemeni politics is notoriously complicated and exotic, with shifting alliances in which former enemies embrace and old friends make strenuous efforts to kill each other. But this exoticism does not mean that the war in Yemen, where the Saudis started bombing on 26 March, is irrelevant to the rest of the world. Already the turmoil there is a breeding ground for al-Qaeda type attacks such as that on Charlie Hebdo in Paris.
The collapse of the country into a permanent state of warfare will send waves of boat-people towards Western Europe or anywhere else they can find refuge. It is absurd for European leaders to pretend that they are doing something about “terrorism” or the refugees drowning in the Mediterranean when they ignore the wars that are the root causes of these events.’
- The History of ‘Thug’
- The unlikely origins of the word ‘thug’
- No, the Young People of Baltimore Are Not ‘Thugs’
- The Racially Charged Meaning Behind The Word ‘Thug’
- After Baltimore riots, some leaders slam ‘thug’ as the new n-word
- U.S. corporate media pushing “thug and criminal” side of Baltimore riots: Interview with Adam Johnson
U.S. corporate media pushing “thug and criminal” side of Baltimore riots: Interview with Adam Johnson
- 5 Examples of Our Gov’t Treating BlackLivesMatter Movement Like a Terrorist Group
- 1968 and the Invention of the American Police State
- Media’s Baltimore ‘Teen Purge’ Narrative Falling Apart
- ‘Why So Much Anger?': If You Don’t Know, Washington Post Won’t Tell You
- NYT Goes to Baltimore, Finds Only Police Worth Talking To
- Why Is the Government Spying on the Black Lives Matter Protests?
- US Government Spying On Citizens: Rise In Undercover Ops A ‘Danger To Democracy’
- Gov’t Used Fusion Centers to Spy on Occupy
- Meet the Private Companies Helping Cops Spy on Protesters
- What the Occupy Wall Street Crackdown Can Teach Us About NSA Spying
- DHS had policy of daily spying on activists
- Police Surveillance and the 2004 Republican National Convention
‘[…] Okinawa makes up just 0.6% of Japan’s land mass but, as the locals will never tire of telling you, it hosts over 70% of the US bases in Japan.
The people of Okinawa are weary of the 70 years of “semi-occupation”. They have long complained of the noise and danger from US planes and helicopters flying day and night.
Most of all they complain of the young men of the US Marine Corps, who are seen as drunken, violent and a threat to Okinawan women.
In fact the statistics speak otherwise – the incidence of rape, murder and other crimes by American personnel in Okinawa is low.
But a small number of horrific cases have done huge harm – in particular the 1995 gang rape of a 13-year-old Okinawan schoolgirl by four US Marines changed attitudes here dramatically.
It’s a big reason why the US government wants to move Futenma, the largest Marine base in Okinawa, out of the densely populated south of the island to a remote spot 60km away.’
- Japan Agrees to New Military Cooperation Plan with United States Despite Its Pacifist Constitution
- U.S. veterans reveal 1962 nuclear close call dodged in Okinawa
- Okinawa orders halt to work related to US base relocation
- Protests Growing in Okinawa Over U.S. Military Presence
- Okinawa elects leader determined to halt new US Marine air base
- Japan still clearing World War II bombs from Okinawa
- US Military Dictatorship Owns 20% of Okinawa: Interview with Peter Kuznick
- US biological weapons reportedly tested in Japan’s Okinawa in 1960s
- Okinawa: The Pentagon’s Pacific junk heap
- US Empire of Bases: Destruction of Okinawa
‘It was an unexpected act of protest that shook Japan’s carefully managed media world: Shigeaki Koga, a regular television commentator and fierce critic of the political establishment, abruptly departed from the scripted conversation during a live TV news program to announce that this would be his last day on the show because, as he put it, network executives had succumbed to political pressure for his removal.
“I have suffered intense bashing by the prime minister’s office,” Mr. Koga told his visibly flabbergasted host late last month, saying he had been removed as commentator because of critical statements he had made about Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. Later in the program, Mr. Koga held up a sign that read “I am not Abe,” a play on the slogan of solidarity for journalists slain in January at a French satirical newspaper.
The outburst created a public firestorm, and not only because of the spectacle of Mr. Koga, a dour-faced former top government official, seemingly throwing away his career as a television commentator in front of millions of viewers. His angry show of defiance also focused national attention on the right-leaning government’s increased strong-arming of the news media to reduce critical coverage.’
‘US and Japanese officials today unveiled the broad strokes of a new set of “guidelines”for military cooperation, eliminating long-standing geographical restrictions on Japan’s involvement that were and are necessitated by the country’s constitution limiting their military engagements.
Pressed heavily by the US to the biggest military buildup since the end of WW2, and with hawkish Prime Minister Shinzo Abe only too willing to go along, US officials are calling the deal an “historic transition” for Japan.
[…] US interests in confronting China militarily are informing much of this policy, with the planned “Asia pivot” by the Pentagon somewhat blunted by a major new US war against ISIS.
The US has been verbally picking fights with China over naval claims for several years now, backing literally every other country in the region whenever claimed naval territory overlaps, and talking up confrontations in both the South China Sea and the East China Sea.’
- Japan Agrees to New Military Cooperation Plan with United States Despite Its Pacifist Constitution
- U.S., Japan unveil new defense guidelines for global Japanese role
- Kerry renews U.S. pledge to Japan security, including East China Sea islets
- Obama hosts Japan’s Abe, hails alliance as ‘indestructible’
- How History Haunts Shinzo Abe’s Vision for Japan
- Japan PM Abe offers ‘deep repentance’ over war with US
- Japanese prime minister stands by apologies for Japan’s WWII abuses
- Japan’s Top Hawk Calls for the United States to End Hair-Trigger Alert
- Japan jet scrambles ‘near Cold War record’
- Retired Japanese Fighter Pilot Sees an Old Danger on the Horizon
- Poll: Americans divided over Japan’s military role in Asia
- Japanese navy gets biggest flat-top since WWII-era aircraft carriers